Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V Krishne Urs vs Rajiv B Urs

V Krishne Urs vs Rajiv B Urs

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Apr 25, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1908103

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/12305/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V Krishne Urs

Respondent

Rajiv B Urs

Excerpt

.....aged about 60 years s/o late basavaraje urs all are r/at door no. 2852, 7th main, 11th cross, adipampa road, v.v. mohalla, mysuru - 570001. …respondents (by sri.abhinav.r. .,advocate) this w.p. is filed under article 227 of the constitution of india praying to quash the order dtd. 18.03.2024 passed by the honble ix addl civil judge and jmfc, mysuru in os no.order of temporary injunction as prayed for in theapplication filed by the petitioners under order xxxix rules 1 and 2 of cpc bearing ia no. 1 dtd. 05.03.2024 before the honble senior civil judge and jmfc, kunigal in o.s.no. 579/2024 vide annx-c. -3- this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, the court made the following:orderlearned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit is posted before the trial court on 01.06.2024 and therefore, the trial court may be directed to dispose of i.a.1 filed for temporaryinjunction within a period of 30 days as contemplated under order39 rule 3a cpc and in the light of the judgment of this court in n.a.haris vs. sri.rajiv hegde & others -(2014) 4 kccr 3162.2. the said submission is placed on record.3. accordingly, the petition is disposed of by directing the trial court to dispose of i.a.1 within a period of 30 days from 01.06.2024. sd/- judge srl.

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 12305 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:

1. V KRISHNE URS AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE K.M. VEERAJE URS,

2. SMT. NANJAMMANNI, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, D/O LATE M.V. SUBRAMANYA RAJE URS,

3. M.S. KRISHNARAJE URS AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O LATE M.V. SUBRAMANYA RAJE URS,

4. MALLARAJE URS S M AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE MALLARAJE URS,

5. SMT. SUMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O LATE VEERARAJE URS, Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R

Location: HIGH      6.   SUDEEP URS,
COURT OF                 AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
KARNATAKA                S/O LATE VEERARAJE URS,

ALL ARE RESIDING AT MALLINATHAPURA VILLAGE, BOPPEGOWDANAPURA HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 463 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR R.,ADVOCATE) -2- AND:

1. RAJIV B URS S/O LATE .M.B. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

2. SMT. RANJEETHA B URS D/O LATE M.B. RAMESH ALIAS M B BASAVARAJE URS, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

3. SUJAY B URS S/O LATE M.B. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

4. SANJAY B URS, S/O LATE M.B. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

5. SMT. ASHWINI URS, D/O S/O LATE M.B. RAMESH ALIAS M.B. BASAVARAJE URS AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

6. M.B. RATNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE BASAVARAJE URS ALL ARE R/AT DOOR NO. 2852, 7TH MAIN, 11TH CROSS, ADIPAMPA ROAD, V.V. MOHALLA, MYSURU - 570001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ABHINAV.R. .,ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 18.03.2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE IX ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU IN OS NO.

ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AS PRAYED FOR IN THE

APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC BEARING IA NO. 1 DTD. 05.03.2024 BEFORE THE HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL IN O.S.NO. 579/2024 VIDE ANNX-C. -3- THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit is posted before the trial court on 01.06.2024 and therefore, the trial court may be directed to dispose of I.A.1 filed for temporary

injunction within a period of 30 days as contemplated under Order

39 Rule 3A CPC and in the light of the judgment of this Court in N.A.Haris vs. Sri.Rajiv Hegde & others -(2014) 4 KCCR 3162.

2. The said submission is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by directing the trial court to dispose of I.A.1 within a period of 30 days from 01.06.2024. Sd/- JUDGE Srl.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial