Vijaya Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Additional Chief

Vijaya vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Additional Chief

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1908030

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1908030
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh,Honourable Mr.Justice V. Lakshminarayanan
Decided On: Jun 27, 2025
Case Number: HCP/692/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijaya

Respondent

State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Additional Chief

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 27.06.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice m.s. ramesh and the honourable mr. justice v. lakshminarayanan vijaya petitioner(s) /mother of the detenue vs1. state of tamil nadu rep.by itsadditional chief home, prohibition and excise department, secretariat, chennai-600 009. 2.the district collector and district magistrate, town police station, tiruvannamalai. central prison, salem. ...respondentsprayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of habeas corpus, to call for the entire records, relating to petitioners son detention under tamil nadu act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 14.03.2025 on the file of the second respondent herein made in proceedings d.o.no.12/2025-c2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the said petitioner's son namely sarathkumar, aged 23 years, son of kumar, before this court and set him at liberty, now petitioner's son detained at central prison, salem.for petitioner : mr.c.c.chellappan for respondents : mr.e.raj thilak additional public prosecutororderand when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by producing a copy of the government order in g.o.rt.no.2263, home, prohibition and excise (xi) department, dated 25.04.2025, submitted that the detention order has already been revoked.2. recording the said submission, this habeas corpus petition stands dismissed as infructuous. [m.s.r., j] [v.l.n., j] index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet: yes/no neutral citation: yes/no anu to1. additional chiefhome, prohibition and excise department, secretariat, chennai-600 009. 2.the district collector and district magistrate, town police station, tiruvannamalai central prison, salem. and anu 6.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN Vijaya Petitioner(s) /mother of the detenue Vs
1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its

Additional Chief Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. Central Prison, Salem. ...Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the entire records, relating to Petitioners son detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 14.03.2025 on the file of the second respondent herein made in proceedings D.O.No.12/2025-C2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the said Petitioner's son namely Sarathkumar, aged 23 years, son of Kumar, before this Court and set him at liberty, now Petitioner's son detained at Central Prison, Salem.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.C.Chellappan For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

and When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by producing a copy of the Government Order in G.O.Rt.No.2263, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XI) Department, dated 25.04.2025, submitted that the detention order has already been revoked.

2. Recording the said submission, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. [M.S.R., J] [V.L.N., J] Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu To

1. Additional Chief

Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai Central Prison, Salem. and Anu 6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Vijaya vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Additional Chief Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh,Honourable Mr.Justice V. La...