Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sheethal Rose vs Nishom Joy

Sheethal Rose vs Nishom Joy

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 01, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1907950

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tr.P(C)/278/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sheethal Rose

Respondent

Nishom Joy

Excerpt

.....- 695 581. sri.v.s.babu gireesan sri.benhur joseph manayani respondent/s: nishom joy aged 37, s/o. joy from sobi villa, pela, kannamangalam village, mavelikkara taluk, now working as programme manager, attinad software pvt ltd,335, third floor, nila building, techno park,thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. smt.thara thamban sri.arun bose sri.b.bipin sri.m.v.thamban sri.r.reji this transfer petition (civil) having been finally heard on 01.04.2019, the court on the same day passed the following:orderthe petitioner herein, who is the respondent in op(div)no.300/2018 of family court, mavelikkara seeks transfer of the above case to family court, thiruvananthapuram. according to the petitioner, she is employed at thiruvananthapuram and she is staying there with her children. she finds extremely difficult to proceed to mavelikkara and to contest the proceedings. it is also stated that the husband is also staying at thiruvananthapuram.2. though, notice was served on the respondent, he appeared and did not seriously oppose the application. hence, i am inclined to allow the tr.p.(c) as follows:1. o.p.(div) no.300/2018 pending before the family court, mavelikkara stands transferred to family court, thiruvananthapuram.2. family court, mavelikkara shall transmit all the records to family court, thiruvananthapuram.3. both sides shall appear before the family court, thiruvananthapuram on 10.06.2019 without any further notice. tr.p(c) is allowed as above. sd/- sunil thomas, judge r.av //true copy// pa to judge appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure -1 true copy of the petition no.300 of 2018 of the familyc ourt, mavelikkara. annexure-2 true copy of the notice dated 28.03.2018. respondent's/s exhibits nil

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MONDAY ,THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1941 (TRANSFER OF OP(DIV)NO.300/2018 of FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA TO FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: SHEETHAL ROSE AGED 37, D/O. V.J DEVASYA RESIDING AT KRA 131 VILLA NO.3, SERIN LE VITTA PEARL VILLA, KOVATTUMUKKU, VETTUROAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 581. SRI.V.S.BABU GIREESAN SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI RESPONDENT/S: NISHOM JOY AGED 37, S/O. JOY FROM SOBI VILLA, PELA, KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, NOW WORKING AS PROGRAMME MANAGER, ATTINAD SOFTWARE PVT LTD,335, THIRD FLOOR, NILA BUILDING, TECHNO PARK,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.ARUN BOSE SRI.B.BIPIN SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioner herein, who is the respondent in OP(Div)No.300/2018 of Family Court, Mavelikkara seeks transfer of the above case to Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram. According to the petitioner, she is employed at Thiruvananthapuram and she is staying there with her children. She finds extremely difficult to proceed to Mavelikkara and to contest the proceedings. It is also stated that the husband is also staying at Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Though, notice was served on the respondent, he appeared and did not seriously oppose the application. Hence, I am inclined to allow the Tr.P.(C) as follows:

1. O.P.(Div) No.300/2018 pending before the Family Court, Mavelikkara stands transferred to Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Family Court, Mavelikkara shall transmit all the records to Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram.

3. Both sides shall appear before the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram on 10.06.2019 without any further notice. Tr.P(C) is allowed as above. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE -1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION NO.300 OF 2018 OF THE FAMILYC OURT, MAVELIKKARA. ANNEXURE-2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 28.03.2018. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS NIL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial