Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

D.N.Malik vs Haridas

D.N.Malik vs Haridas

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 29, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1907725

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/1207/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D.N.Malik

Respondent

Haridas

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan monday, the 29th day of july 2019 / 7th sravana, 1941 rsa.no.1207 of 2004 against the judgment and decree dated 21-06-2004 in as 106/2002 of principal sub court, alappuzha against the judgment and decree dated 23-02-2000 in os 62/1996 of additional munsiff court, alappuzha appellant/appellant/plaintiff: d.n.malik, s/o narayanan, aged 54 years, thompoli muri, aryad south village, alappuzha. by advs. sri.k.s.hariharaputhran sri.george mathew respondents/respondents/defendants:1 haridas, s/o narayanan, aged 41 years, 2 mohanan, s/o.narayanan, aged 50 years 3 sasidharan, s/o.narayanan, aged 43 years, thumpoli muri, aryad south cillage, alappuzha. 4 radhamony, w/o.chandraekharan, aged 43 years, residing at devaswom parambil house, 5 suseela haridas, w/o.haridas, devaswom parambil house, thumpoli muri, devaswom parambil house, aryad south village, alappuzha. r1 to r3 by advs. sri.a.krishnan sri.v.satheeshthis regular second appeal having been finally heard on 29.07.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa.no.1207 of 2004 2judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that there is no instruction from the party concerned. no steps were taken as against respondents 4 and 5. hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp //true copy// p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1941 RSA.No.1207 of 2004 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21-06-2004 IN AS 106/2002 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-02-2000 IN OS 62/1996 of ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ALAPPUZHA APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: D.N.MALIK, S/O NARAYANAN, AGED 54 YEARS, THOMPOLI MURI, ARYAD SOUTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SRI.GEORGE MATHEW RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

1 HARIDAS, S/O NARAYANAN, AGED 41 YEARS, 2 MOHANAN, S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 50 YEARS 3 SASIDHARAN, S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 43 YEARS, THUMPOLI MURI, ARYAD SOUTH CILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA. 4 RADHAMONY, W/O.CHANDRAEKHARAN, AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT DEVASWOM PARAMBIL HOUSE, 5 SUSEELA HARIDAS, W/O.HARIDAS, DEVASWOM PARAMBIL HOUSE, THUMPOLI MURI, DEVASWOM PARAMBIL HOUSE, ARYAD SOUTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA. R1 TO R3 BY ADVS. SRI.A.KRISHNAN SRI.V.SATHEESH

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA.No.1207 of 2004 2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that there is no instruction from the party concerned. No steps were taken as against respondents 4 and 5. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial