B.SUTHA Vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep by its, The Additional Chief Secretary to Government,

B.Sutha vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep by its, The Additional Chief Secretary to Government,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1906881

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1906881
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh,Honourable Mr.Justice V. Lakshminarayanan
Decided On: Jun 27, 2025
Case Number: HCP/685/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B.Sutha

Respondent

State Of Tamil Nadu Rep by its, The Additional Chief Secretary to Government,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 27.06.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice m.s. ramesh and the honourable mr. justice v. lakshminarayanan b.sutha petitioner(s) /mother of the detenue vs1. state of tamil nadu rep by its, the additional chief secretary to ...respondents prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of habeas corpus, to call for the records in connection with theorder of detention passed by the 2nd respondent inno.150/bcdfgisssv/2025 dated 12.03.2025 against the petitioner's son vishal @ gundu vishal, aged about 30 years, s/o.baskar, at present, who is confined at central prison, puzhal, chennai set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before the court and set him at liberty. for petitioner : mr.s.prabhudoss for respondents : mr.e.raj thilak additional public prosecutororderand when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by producing a copy of the government order in g.o.rt.no.2264, home, prohibition and excise (x) department, dated 25.04.2025, submitted that the detention order has already been revoked.2. recording the said submission, this habeas corpus petition stands dismissed as infructuous. [m.s.r., j] [v.l.n., j] index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet: yes/no neutral citation: yes/no anu to 1.the additional chief secretary to and anu 5.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN B.Sutha Petitioner(s) /mother of the detenue Vs
1. State Of Tamil Nadu Rep by its, The Additional Chief Secretary to ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in connection with the

order of Detention passed by the 2nd respondent in

No.150/BCDFGISSSV/2025 dated 12.03.2025 against the petitioner's son Vishal @ Gundu vishal, aged about 30 years, S/o.Baskar, at present, who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before the Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Prabhudoss For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

and When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by producing a copy of the Government Order in G.O.Rt.No.2264, Home, Prohibition and Excise (X) Department, dated 25.04.2025, submitted that the detention order has already been revoked.

2. Recording the said submission, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. [M.S.R., J] [V.L.N., J] Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu To 1.The Additional Chief Secretary to and Anu 5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties B.Sutha vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep by its, The Additional Chi... Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh,Honourable Mr.Justice V. La...