Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Reeja vs P.Anandan

REEJA vs P.Anandan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 08, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1906706

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/725/2010

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

REEJA

Respondent

P.Anandan

Excerpt

& mat.appeal.no. 671 of 2010 appellant/respondent: p.anandan, s/o. kunhiraman, aged 34 years puthiyarambath house,naduvannur,koyilandy taluk. kozhikode dist. respondent/petitioner: reeja, aged 28 years, d/o. kannan nair, malayil house,karthikappally amsom desom,, karthikappally p.o,pin 673 542,vadakara taluk.08.01.2019, along with mat.appeal.725/2010, the court on ma 671 & 725/2010 2 & mat.appeal.no. 725 of 2010 appellant/petitioner: reeja d/o. kannan nair, malayil house karthikapally amsom desom, vadakara taluk, (edacheri psl) respondent/respondent: p.anandan s/o. kunhiraman puthiyarambath house, naduvannur, koyilandy taluk, (balussery psl) 673001. 08.01.2019, along with mat.appeal.671/2010, the court on ma 671 & 725/2010 3judgment[ mat.appeal 671/2010,mat.appeal.725/2010 ]shaffique,j.learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and they may be permitted to withdraw the cases. permission is granted and the mat appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. a.m.shaffique judge shircy v. ks judge

Full Judgment

& Mat.Appeal.No. 671 of 2010 APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: P.ANANDAN, S/O. KUNHIRAMAN, AGED 34 YEARS PUTHIYARAMBATH HOUSE,NADUVANNUR,KOYILANDY TALUK. KOZHIKODE DIST. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: REEJA, AGED 28 YEARS, D/O. KANNAN NAIR, MALAYIL HOUSE,KARTHIKAPPALLY AMSOM DESOM,, KARTHIKAPPALLY P.O,PIN 673 542,VADAKARA TALUK.

08.01.2019, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.725/2010, THE COURT ON MA 671 & 725/2010 2 & Mat.Appeal.No. 725 of 2010 APPELLANT/PETITIONER: REEJA D/O. KANNAN NAIR, MALAYIL HOUSE KARTHIKAPALLY AMSOM DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, (EDACHERI PSL) RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: P.ANANDAN S/O. KUNHIRAMAN PUTHIYARAMBATH HOUSE, NADUVANNUR, KOYILANDY TALUK, (BALUSSERY PSL) 673001. 08.01.2019, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.671/2010, THE COURT ON MA 671 & 725/2010 3

JUDGMENT

[ Mat.Appeal 671/2010,Mat.Appeal.725/2010 ]

Shaffique,J.

Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and they may be permitted to withdraw the cases. Permission is granted and the Mat Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE SHIRCY V. ks JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial