Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Ramadas vs Ramasamy Konar

Ramadas vs Ramasamy Konar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 30, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1906343

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/10763/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramadas

Respondent

Ramasamy Konar

Excerpt

c.m.p no.10763 of 2021 in s.a no.366 of 2021a.a.nakkiran, j.this petition is filed to record that the 2nd respondent is already on record as the legal representative of the deceased 2nd appellant danabakkiyam in s.a no.366 of 2021.2. the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in allowing this petition.3. in view of no objection expressed by the other side, and having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed.4. the registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment. 30.04.2025 uma (2/2) note: post the second appeal on 18.06.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P No.10763 of 2021 in S.A No.366 of 2021

A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.

This petition is filed to record that the 2nd respondent is already on record as the legal representative of the deceased 2nd appellant Danabakkiyam in S.A No.366 of 2021.

2. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in allowing this petition.

3. In view of no objection expressed by the other side, and having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed.

4. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment. 30.04.2025 uma (2/2) Note: Post the second appeal on 18.06.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Ramadas vs Ramasamy Konar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice a.a.Nakkiran

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales