Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

D.Kumar vs State by, the Inspector of Police,

D.Kumar vs State by, the Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 28, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1906115

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/8583/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D.Kumar

Respondent

State by, the Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

inin the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 28.04.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice sunder mohan in d.kumar ...petitioner/accused vs. the state rep. by the inspector of police, ...respondent/complainant prayer: this criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed under section 528 of bnss act, to modify the condition in para no.06 in crl.o.p.no.7515 of 2025 dated 19.03.2025. for petitioner(s): mr.n.anandan for respondent(s): mr.s.balaji government advocate (crl.side)page no.1 of 3 inorderthe petitioner seeks modification of the court before which, the petitioner should surrender and execute sureties.2. heard both sides.3. considering the averments made in the petition, the petitioner isdirected to surrender and execute sureties before the learned judicial magistrate cum district munsif, solinganallur. the other conditions imposed in the order dated 19.03.2025 in crl.o.p. no.7515 of 2025, shall remain unaltered.4. accordingly, the criminal original petition is ordered, and the condition is modified. dk page no.2 of 3 insunder mohan, j.dk to 1.the inspector of police,2. the public prosecutor high court of madras, chennai.3. the judicial magistrate cum district munsif, solinganallur. in page no.3 of 3

Full Judgment

in

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in D.Kumar ...Petitioner/Accused Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, ...Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to modify the condition in para no.06 in Crl.O.P.No.7515 of 2025 dated 19.03.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Anandan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Page No.1 of 3 in

ORDER

The petitioner seeks modification of the Court before which, the petitioner should surrender and execute sureties.

2. Heard both sides.

3. Considering the averments made in the petition, the petitioner is

directed to surrender and execute sureties before the learned Judicial Magistrate cum District Munsif, Solinganallur. The other conditions imposed in the order dated 19.03.2025 in Crl.O.P. No.7515 of 2025, shall remain unaltered.

4. Accordingly, the criminal original petition is ordered, and the condition is modified. dk Page No.2 of 3 in

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

dk To 1.The Inspector of Police,

2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai.

3. The Judicial Magistrate cum District Munsif, Solinganallur. in Page No.3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial