Full Judgment
THURSDAY ,THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1940 RSA.No. 743 of 2004 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29-01-2004 IN AS 612/2003 of DISTRICT COURT,THRISSUR AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29-10-1998 IN OS 21/1998 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: DAVIS, S/O CHAMAVALAPPIL KUNJU VAREED, VATTANATHARA DESOM, AMBALLOOR VILLAGE, RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANTS 2 & 3: 1 PHILOMINA, W/O PANTHALLOOKARAN JOSE, PUKKOTTU DESOM, AMBALLOOR VILLAGE, 2 JOSE, HUSBAND OF 1ST RESPONDENT, -DO- DESOM, -DO- VILLAGE, -DO- TALUK. 3 KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 4 SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE THRISSUR (R.D.O). R3 AND R4 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.02.2019, ALONG WITH OP.5882/2000, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: [RSA 743/2004,OP.5882/2000] 2 THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1940 OP.No. 5882 of 2000 PETITIONERS: 1 DAVIS, SON OF CHAMAVALAPPIL KUNJU VAREED, VATTANTHARA DESOM, AMBALLOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK 2 PALLIVATHUKKAL SANKARAN, VATTANTHARA, VENDOOR PADASEKARAM, VATTANTHARA DESOM, DO. DO 3 KURUMBA, WIFE OF KIZHAKKOODAL KOCHU RAMAN, DO. DO. 4 KUNNATHU PARAMBIL LAKSHMY, DO. DO.
5 MANNULLY INASU JACOB, DO. DO. 6 K.P.JACOB, DO. DO. RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRICHUR, COLLECTORATE AYYANTHOLE, THRICHUR. 2 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE) , AYYANTHOLE, TRICHUR.
3 THE SECRETARY, GRAMA PANCHAYAT, AMBALLOOR, TRICHUR DISTRICT. 4 PHILOMINA, W/O PANTHALLUKKARAN JOSE, POOKODE DESOM, AMBALLUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADVS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ARLISS TRENCY ANTONY SRI.K.K.JAYASOORIAN SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.02.2019, ALONG WITH RSA.743/2004, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: [RSA 743/2004,OP.5882/2000] 3
JUDGMENT
The appellant counsel passed away. Nobody represented for the appellant. The appellant remained absent. Hence, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE