Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Davis vs Philomina

DAVIS vs Philomina

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 28, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1905947

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/743/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

DAVIS

Respondent

Philomina

Excerpt

thursday ,the 28th day of february 2019 / 9th phalguna, 1940 rsa.no. 743 of 2004 against the judgment and decree dated 29-01-2004 in as 612/2003 of district court,thrissur against the judgment and decree dated 29-10-1998 in os 21/1998 of principal munsiff court, irinjalakuda appellant/appellant/defendant: davis, s/o chamavalappil kunju vareed, vattanathara desom, amballoor village, respondents/respondents/plaintiff/defendants 2 & 3: 1 philomina, w/o panthallookaran jose, pukkottu desom, amballoor village, 2 jose, husband of 1st respondent, -do- desom, -do- village, -do- taluk. 3 kerala state represented by district collector, thrissur. 4 sub divisional magistrate thrissur (r.d.o). r3 and r4 by adv. government pleaderthis regular second appeal having been finally heard on 28.02.2019, along with op.5882/2000, the court on the same day delivered the following: [rsa 743/2004,op.5882/2000] 2 thursday, the 28th day of february 2019 / 9th phalguna, 1940 op.no. 5882 of 2000 petitioners: 1 davis, son of chamavalappil kunju vareed, vattanthara desom, amballoor village, mukundapuram taluk 2 pallivathukkal sankaran, vattanthara, vendoor padasekaram, vattanthara desom, do. do 3 kurumba, wife of kizhakkoodal kochu raman, do. do. 4 kunnathu parambil lakshmy, do. do.5 mannully inasu jacob, do. do. 6 k.p.jacob, do. do. respondents: 1 state of kerala, represented by district collector, trichur, collectorate ayyanthole, thrichur. 2 revenue divisional officer (sub divisional magistrate) , ayyanthole, trichur.3 the secretary, grama panchayat, amballoor, trichur district. 4 philomina, w/o panthallukkaran jose, pookode desom, amballur village, mukundapuram taluk. by advs. government pleader smt.arliss trency antony sri.k.k.jayasoorian sri.v.m.krishnakumar this original petition having been finally heard on 28.02.2019, along with rsa.743/2004, the court on the same day passed the following: [rsa 743/2004,op.5882/2000] 3judgmentthe appellant counsel passed away. nobody represented for t

Full Judgment

THURSDAY ,THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1940 RSA.No. 743 of 2004 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29-01-2004 IN AS 612/2003 of DISTRICT COURT,THRISSUR AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29-10-1998 IN OS 21/1998 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: DAVIS, S/O CHAMAVALAPPIL KUNJU VAREED, VATTANATHARA DESOM, AMBALLOOR VILLAGE, RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANTS 2 & 3: 1 PHILOMINA, W/O PANTHALLOOKARAN JOSE, PUKKOTTU DESOM, AMBALLOOR VILLAGE, 2 JOSE, HUSBAND OF 1ST RESPONDENT, -DO- DESOM, -DO- VILLAGE, -DO- TALUK. 3 KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 4 SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE THRISSUR (R.D.O). R3 AND R4 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.02.2019, ALONG WITH OP.5882/2000, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: [RSA 743/2004,OP.5882/2000] 2 THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1940 OP.No. 5882 of 2000 PETITIONERS: 1 DAVIS, SON OF CHAMAVALAPPIL KUNJU VAREED, VATTANTHARA DESOM, AMBALLOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK 2 PALLIVATHUKKAL SANKARAN, VATTANTHARA, VENDOOR PADASEKARAM, VATTANTHARA DESOM, DO. DO 3 KURUMBA, WIFE OF KIZHAKKOODAL KOCHU RAMAN, DO. DO. 4 KUNNATHU PARAMBIL LAKSHMY, DO. DO.

5 MANNULLY INASU JACOB, DO. DO. 6 K.P.JACOB, DO. DO. RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRICHUR, COLLECTORATE AYYANTHOLE, THRICHUR. 2 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE) , AYYANTHOLE, TRICHUR.

3 THE SECRETARY, GRAMA PANCHAYAT, AMBALLOOR, TRICHUR DISTRICT. 4 PHILOMINA, W/O PANTHALLUKKARAN JOSE, POOKODE DESOM, AMBALLUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADVS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ARLISS TRENCY ANTONY SRI.K.K.JAYASOORIAN SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.02.2019, ALONG WITH RSA.743/2004, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: [RSA 743/2004,OP.5882/2000] 3

JUDGMENT

The appellant counsel passed away. Nobody represented for the appellant. The appellant remained absent. Hence, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial