Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Management of vs the Principal Secretary

The Management of vs The Principal Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 19, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1905579

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/13658/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Management of

Respondent

The Principal Secretary

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 19th day of december, 2024 before the hon'ble ms. justice jyoti mulimani writ petition no. 13658 of 2024 (l-pg) between: the management of m/s. gaviranga enterprises, registered under the indian partnership act, 1932, having its registered office at no. c-9, industrial estate, tumkur-572 103, represented by its partner, mr. sanjay ranganath. …petitioner (by sri. prashanth.b.k., advocate)and: the principal secretary, labour department, government of karnataka, digitally signed by premchandra m vikasa soudha, r location: high bengaluru-560 001. court of karnataka …respondent (by sri. s.h.raghavendra., aga) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, seeking certain reliefs. this writ petition is listed for preliminary hearing in 'b' group, this day, an order is made as under: -2-oral ordersri.prashanth.b.k., counsel for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing. sri.s.h.raghavendra., aga for the respondent has appeared in person. counsel sri.prashanth.b.k., submits that the petitioner has obtained the insurance. hence, they do not wish to press the writ petition. counsel therefore, submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. when queried, counsel sri.prashanth.b.k., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. the oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner about withdrawal of the petition is placed on record. the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (jyoti mulimani) judge tkn,mrp list no.: 1 sl no.: 27.7

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13658 OF 2024 (L-PG) BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. GAVIRANGA ENTERPRISES, REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. C-9, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, TUMKUR-572 103, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, MR. SANJAY RANGANATH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASHANTH.B.K., ADVOCATE)

AND: THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M VIKASA SOUDHA, R Location: High BENGALURU-560 001. Court of Karnataka …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.H.RAGHAVENDRA., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: -2-

ORAL ORDER

Sri.Prashanth.B.K., counsel for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing. Sri.S.H.Raghavendra., AGA for the respondent has appeared in person. Counsel Sri.Prashanth.B.K., submits that the petitioner has obtained the insurance. Hence, they do not wish to press the Writ Petition. Counsel therefore, submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Sri.Prashanth.B.K., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner about withdrawal of the petition is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN,MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27.7

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial