Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satheesan, vs the Chief Manager,

Satheesan, vs The Chief Manager,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 28, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1904267

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
FAO/70/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satheesan,

Respondent

The Chief Manager,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice v.chitambaresh & the honourable mr. justice ashok menon monday, the 28th day of october 2019 / 6th karthika, 1941 fao.no.70 of 2019 i.a. no.2016/17 in op(ele)no.10/2011 of i additional district court, kollam appellant/petitioner: satheesan,aged 49 years,s/o.nanu, sruthi bhavan,irulankadu,venture p.o., aryankavu village,pathanapuram taluk, kollam district. by adv. smt.g.vidya respondents/respondents: 1 the chief manager,power grid corporation of india ltd., vilagompurayidom,doctors lane, pathanamthitta 689 645. 2 the special thahasildar (compensation) power grid corporation of india ltd., la(pgci),pathanamthitta 689 645. r1 by adv.millu dandapani r2 by government pleader smt.k.b.sony this first appeal from orders having come up for admission on 28.10.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: f.a.o.no.70/2019judgmentchitambaresh, j.heard the counsel for the appellant as well as the standing counsel for the respondents. all that the appellant prays is for restoration of op(ele.) no. 10/11 for disposal on merits. the respondents point out that op(ele.) no. 10/11 was once dismissed for default and restored to file.2. we are inclined to grant one more opportunity to the appellant. the impugned order is set aside and op(ele.) district judge, kollam shall make every endeavour to dispose of op(ele.) no. 10/11 on merits within three months.3. we however make it clear that the appellant is not entitled to interest for the period from the dismissal for default and its restoration of op(ele) no. 10/11. the appeal is disposed of. v. chitambaresh ashok menon ncd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1941 FAO.No.70 OF 2019 I.A. NO.2016/17 IN OP(ELE)NO.10/2011 OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SATHEESAN,AGED 49 YEARS,S/O.NANU, SRUTHI BHAVAN,IRULANKADU,VENTURE P.O., ARYANKAVU VILLAGE,PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.G.VIDYA RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 THE CHIEF MANAGER,POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., VILAGOMPURAYIDOM,DOCTORS LANE, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 645. 2 THE SPECIAL THAHASILDAR (COMPENSATION) POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., LA(PGCI),PATHANAMTHITTA 689 645. R1 BY ADV.MILLU DANDAPANI R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.B.SONY THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: F.A.O.NO.70/2019

JUDGMENT

Chitambaresh, J.

Heard the counsel for the appellant as well as the standing counsel for the respondents. All that the appellant prays is for restoration of OP(Ele.) No. 10/11 for disposal on merits. The respondents point out that OP(Ele.) No. 10/11 was once dismissed for default and restored to file.

2. We are inclined to grant one more opportunity to the appellant. The impugned order is set aside and OP(Ele.) District Judge, Kollam shall make every endeavour to dispose of OP(Ele.) No. 10/11 on merits within three months.

3. We however make it clear that the appellant is not entitled to interest for the period from the dismissal for default and its restoration of OP(Ele) No. 10/11. The appeal is disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH ASHOK MENON ncd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial