Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mr. Radhakrishna vs M/S Bagmane Developers Private Limited

Mr. Radhakrishna vs M/S Bagmane Developers Private Limited

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 01, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1904100

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/281/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Radhakrishna

Respondent

M/S Bagmane Developers Private Limited

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of july, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice suraj govindaraj civil revision petition no. 281 of 2023 (io) between:1. mr. radhakrishna aged about 77 years s/o late ganesh redy2. mr r b murali aged about 50 years3. mr r lokesh aged about 46 years4. mr r vinu aged about 44 years all are r/at no 101, digitally signed patel house,by ngr layout, narayanappa doddanekundi village, lakshmamma bangalore 560037location: high court of karnataka …petitioners (by sri. rajesh s & sri. ajay kumar.,advocates-absent) and: m/s bagmane developers private limited 8th floor, lakeview, a block, bagmane tech park, c v raman nagar, bangalore 560093 -2- represented by its founder and managing director mr raja bagmane …respondent (by smt. latha s.shetty., advocate) this crp filed u/s. 115 of cpc praying to revise the impugned order dated 21.04.2023 passed by the xv hon’ble additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-3), bangalore and consequently, dismiss the i.a.no.6 filed by the respondent under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 and restore the original suit in o.s.no.908/2023 on the file of xv additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-3), bangalore and etc. this crp, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:orderdespite the order dated 22.6.2024, none appears for the petitioner today also. it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- judge sr list no.: 2 sl no.: 39

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 281 OF 2023 (IO) BETWEEN:

1. MR. RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS S/O LATE GANESH REDY

2. MR R B MURALI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

3. MR R LOKESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

4. MR R VINU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NO 101, Digitally signed PATEL HOUSE,

by                       NGR LAYOUT,
NARAYANAPPA              DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE,
LAKSHMAMMA               BANGALORE 560037

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJESH S & SRI. AJAY KUMAR.,ADVOCATES-ABSENT) AND: M/S BAGMANE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED 8TH FLOOR, LAKEVIEW, A BLOCK, BAGMANE TECH PARK, C V RAMAN NAGAR, BANGALORE 560093 -2- REPRESENTED BY ITS FOUNDER AND MANAGING DIRECTOR MR RAJA BAGMANE …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. LATHA S.SHETTY., ADVOCATE) THIS CRP FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVISE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21.04.2023 PASSED BY THE XV HON’BLE ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-3), BANGALORE AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS THE I.A.NO.6 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 AND RESTORE THE ORIGINAL SUIT IN O.S.NO.908/2023 ON THE FILE OF XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-3), BANGALORE AND ETC. THIS CRP, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Despite the order dated 22.6.2024, none appears for the petitioner today also. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE SR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 39

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial