Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abhishek vs State of Karnataka

Abhishek vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1903062

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/11660/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abhishek

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....department of forest, ecology and environment, government of karnataka, vidhana soudha,6. deputy conservator of forest, halliyal division, halliyal - 581329.7. the senior geologist, dist: uttar kannada - 581 301.8. moef and cc, ministry of environment forest and climate change, kormangala, bangalore.9. the director,kali tiger reserve, dandelli - 590 001. …respondents (by sri s.s.mahendra., government advocate) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to the impugned endorsement dated 05/01/2023 bearing no.d1/gfl/cr-10/2022-23/3993, produced at annexure-a issued by the respondent no.6 and etc. this writ petition coming on for priliminary hearing, this day chief justice made the following: -3-orderlearned advocate mr. abhijeet s. kankonkar, who appears through video conferencing seeks permission to withdraw the present petition upon instructions of the petitioner.2. permission is granted.3. the petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.any subsequent development will furnish fresh cause of action to the petitioner for filing a fresh remedial action, if aggrieved. chief justice judge vbs list no.: 1 sl no.: 13

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No. 11660 OF 2024 (GM-MMS) BETWEEN: ABHISHEK, S/O SHUBASH KANKONKAR, AGE 24 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O.HP No.17, RAMNAGAR, TAL: JOIDA, DIST: KARWAR (U K) 581453. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ABHIJEET S. KANKONKAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally AND: signed by VALLI

MARIMUTHU       1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Location:            REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
High Court of        VIDHAN SOUDHA,
Karnataka            BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE SECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIKAS SOUDHA,

3. THE DIRECTOR AND COMMISSIONER, KHANIJ BHAVAN, -2- RACE COURSE ROAD,

4. THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, KARNATAKA FOREST DEPARTMENT, ARANYA BHAVAN, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560 003.

5. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA,

6. DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, HALLIYAL DIVISION, HALLIYAL - 581329.

7. THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA - 581 301.

8. MOEF AND CC, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE, KORMANGALA, BANGALORE.

9. THE DIRECTOR,

KALI TIGER RESERVE, DANDELLI - 590 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S.S.MAHENDRA., GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 05/01/2023 BEARING No.D1/GFL/CR-10/2022-23/3993, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.6 AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRILIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING: -3-

ORDER

Learned advocate Mr. Abhijeet S. Kankonkar, who appears through video conferencing seeks permission to withdraw the present petition upon instructions of the petitioner.

2. Permission is granted.

3. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

Any subsequent development will furnish fresh cause of action to the petitioner for filing a fresh remedial action, if aggrieved. CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial