Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Branch Manager vs Mohammed Yasin

The Branch Manager vs Mohammed Yasin

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1902813

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/9372/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Branch Manager

Respondent

Mohammed Yasin

Excerpt

in c.m.a.sr.no.55336 of 2025t.v. thamilselvi, j.this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 188 days in filing the above civil miscellaneous appeal against the award dated 25.03.2024 passed in m.c.o.p.no. 66 of 2016, on the file of motor accident claims tribunal, district court, nagapattinam.2. ms.i.malar, learned counsel for appellant submitted that aftergetting sanction from the competent authorities, the appeal papers forwarded by the regional office to the counsel on record and thereafter, due to misplace of bundle, they could not file the appeal within a stipulated time. subsequently, the appeal was filed on 05.02.2025, as a result of which, there is a delay of 188 days in filing the above civil miscellaneous appeal arose, which is neither willful nor wanton. therefore, he filed this petition to condone the delay in filing the above civil miscellaneous appeal.3. considering the facts and circumstances, and the reasons stated bythe petitioner in the affidavit is justifiable one. accordingly, this court is inclined to allow this petition. registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal if it is otherwise found to be in order. rppt.v.thamilselvi, j.rpp c.m.p.no. 9372 of 2025 in c.m.a.sr. no. 55336 of 2025

Full Judgment

in C.M.A.SR.No.55336 of 2025

T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 188 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the award dated 25.03.2024 passed in M.C.O.P.No. 66 of 2016, on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Court, Nagapattinam.

2. Ms.I.Malar, learned counsel for appellant submitted that after

getting sanction from the competent authorities, the appeal papers forwarded by the Regional Office to the counsel on record and thereafter, due to misplace of bundle, they could not file the appeal within a stipulated time. Subsequently, the appeal was filed on 05.02.2025, as a result of which, there is a delay of 188 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arose, which is neither willful nor wanton. Therefore, he filed this petition to condone the delay in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances, and the reasons stated by

the petitioner in the affidavit is justifiable one. Accordingly, this court is inclined to allow this petition. Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal if it is otherwise found to be in order. rpp

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

rpp C.M.P.No. 9372 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR. No. 55336 of 2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial