Aasif Vs State Rep by SHO,

Aasif vs State Rep by SHO,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 22, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1902207

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1902207
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Sep 22, 2025
Case Number: CRL OP/12395/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aasif

Respondent

State Rep by SHO,

Excerpt

.....respondent police. for petitioner : mr.v. r. bharath kumar for respondent : mr.a. gopinath government advocateorderthe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.07.2024 seeking bail in connection with the case in cr.no.15 of 2024, registered for the offence under sections 8(c), r/w 20(b)(ii)(c), 29(1), 25 of the ndps act, 19852. the case of the prosecution is that on a specific information, theofficers of the respondent seized 258.300 kgs of ganja. it is alleged that the petitioner along with accused were involved in illegal transportation of 258.300 kgs of ganja in the vehicle. hence, the case.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the co-accusedin this case was granted bail. he further submitted that no contraband was recovered from this petitioner and only based on the confession of the co- accused this petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. hence, prays to grant bail to the petitioner.4. the learned government advocate appearing for the respondentsubmitted has filed a counter wherein it was stated that when the petitioner along with a1 was transporting ganja in the vehicle, the property was recovered. he further submitted that the petitioner belongs to kerala and when he was transporting from odissa to ramanathapuram, the contraband was seized. further the statement of the petitioner was also recorded,wherein, it was stated that the relative of the petitioner will bring ganja from odissa and give it to the petitioner and he will sell the same.5. heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.6. on a perusal of the statement recorded from the accused he himselfhas admitted that they procure the ganga from his relative and sell the same. hence, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. accordingly this petition is dismissed. smn to1. nib-cid police station, villupuram2. the public prosecutor, high court of madras.k.rajasekar, j.smn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Aasif ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep by SHO, NIB-CID Police Station, Villupuram ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.15 of 2024 pending investigation before the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.V. R. Bharath Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A. Gopinath Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.07.2024 seeking bail in connection with the case in Cr.No.15 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 8(c), r/w 20(b)(ii)(c), 29(1), 25 of the NDPS Act, 1985

2. The case of the prosecution is that on a specific information, the

Officers of the respondent seized 258.300 kgs of ganja. It is alleged that the petitioner along with accused were involved in illegal transportation of 258.300 kgs of ganja in the vehicle. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the co-accused

in this case was granted bail. He further submitted that no contraband was recovered from this petitioner and only based on the confession of the co- accused this petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent

submitted has filed a counter wherein it was stated that when the petitioner along with A1 was transporting ganja in the vehicle, the property was recovered. He further submitted that the petitioner belongs to Kerala and when he was transporting from Odissa to Ramanathapuram, the contraband was seized. Further the statement of the petitioner was also recorded,

wherein, it was stated that the relative of the petitioner will bring ganja from Odissa and give it to the petitioner and he will sell the same.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. On a perusal of the statement recorded from the accused he himself

has admitted that they procure the ganga from his relative and sell the same. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly this petition is dismissed. smn To

1. NIB-CID Police Station, Villupuram

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

smn

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Aasif vs State Rep by SHO, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar