Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mini Sajeev vs Sajeev

Mini Sajeev vs Sajeev

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 29, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1901165

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/749/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mini Sajeev

Respondent

Sajeev

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mr.justice t.v.anilkumar tuesday, the 29th day of october 2019 / 7th karthika, 1941 mat.appeal.no.749 of 2013 against the order in os 116/2007 dated 18-01-2013 of family court,kollam appellant/plaintiff: mini sajeev aged 38 years,w/o sajeev, sajeev bhavanam, puthuppally south muri, puthuppally village, from kozhuvazhappally, madathil karazhama muri, ochira village, karunagappally taluk, kollam district. by adv. sri.johnson gomez respondents/defendants: 1 sajeev aged 45 years, s/o haridasan, sajeev bhavanam, 2 omana aged 68 years w/o haridasan, residing at sajeev bhavanam, :-2-: r1-2 by adv. sri.t.s.harikumar r1-2 by adv. sri.k.jagadeesh r1-2 by adv. sri.raajesh s.subrahmanian r1-2 by adv. sri.p.b.sahasranaman this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 29.10.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: :-3-: dated this the 29th day of october, 2019j u d g m e n tshaffique, j.learned counsel for the appellant and respondent submits that the matter has already been settled. hence, there is no necessity to proceed with the appeal on merits. accordingly, the application to condone the delay and this mat.appeal are dismissed as not pressed. a.m.shaffique t.v.anilkumar ami/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1941 Mat.Appeal.No.749 OF 2013 AGAINST THE ORDER IN OS 116/2007 DATED 18-01-2013 OF FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: MINI SAJEEV AGED 38 YEARS,W/O SAJEEV, SAJEEV BHAVANAM, PUTHUPPALLY SOUTH MURI, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE, FROM KOZHUVAZHAPPALLY, MADATHIL KARAZHAMA MURI, OCHIRA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 SAJEEV AGED 45 YEARS, S/O HARIDASAN, SAJEEV BHAVANAM, 2 OMANA AGED 68 YEARS W/O HARIDASAN, RESIDING AT SAJEEV BHAVANAM, :-2-: R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.K.JAGADEESH R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.RAAJESH S.SUBRAHMANIAN R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :-3-: Dated this the 29th day of October, 2019

J U D G M E N T

SHAFFIQUE, J.

Learned counsel for the appellant and respondent submits that the matter has already been settled. Hence, there is no necessity to proceed with the appeal on merits. Accordingly, the application to condone the delay and this Mat.Appeal are dismissed as not pressed. A.M.SHAFFIQUE T.V.ANILKUMAR ami/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial