Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Paul Mathew vs Susan

Paul Mathew vs SUSAN

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 01, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1901141

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/8/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Paul Mathew

Respondent

SUSAN

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice k.harilal & the honourable mrs. justice annie john monday, the 01st day of april 2019 / 11th chaithra, 1941 against the order/judgment in op 742/2012 of family court, muvattupuzha dated 23-10-2013 appellant/s: paul mathew s/o. mathai, mambillikkuzhiyil house, south marady village, south marady kara, muvattupuzha taluk. sri.m.n.manoj sri.sinu.g.nath respondent/s: susan aged 38 years d/o thomas, manalikkal house, v. kottayam, pramadom village, kozhanchery taluk, pathanamthitta district - 691 014. sri.m.ajith (karicode) sri.r.mohana babu this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 01.04.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: kkj -:2:-judgmentharilal,j it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for both partiesthat the disputes involved in this appeal have been settled by way of mediation. the memorandum of agreement entered into between the parties is also produced along with the report filed by the mediator. the terms of settlement in the memorandum of agreement would form part of this judgment. this appeal will stand disposed of accordingly.2. as per the direction of this court, the appellant depositedrupees eleven lakhs before the family court, muvattupuzha. but as per the terms of the agreement, the respondent is entitled to get rupees ten lakhs only. therefore, the family court, muvattupuzha is hereby directed to release rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only) to the appellant herein, forthwith. k.harilal annie john kkj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANNIE JOHN MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 742/2012 of FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 23-10-2013 APPELLANT/S: PAUL MATHEW S/O. MATHAI, MAMBILLIKKUZHIYIL HOUSE, SOUTH MARADY VILLAGE, SOUTH MARADY KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK. SRI.M.N.MANOJ SRI.SINU.G.NATH RESPONDENT/S: SUSAN AGED 38 YEARS D/O THOMAS, MANALIKKAL HOUSE, V. KOTTAYAM, PRAMADOM VILLAGE, KOZHANCHERY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 691 014. SRI.M.AJITH (KARICODE) SRI.R.MOHANA BABU THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: kkj -:2:-

JUDGMENT

Harilal,J It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for both parties

that the disputes involved in this appeal have been settled by way of mediation. The memorandum of agreement entered into between the parties is also produced along with the report filed by the Mediator. The terms of settlement in the memorandum of agreement would form part of this judgment. This appeal will stand disposed of accordingly.

2. As per the direction of this Court, the appellant deposited

Rupees Eleven lakhs before the Family Court, Muvattupuzha. But as per the terms of the agreement, the respondent is entitled to get Rupees ten lakhs only. Therefore, the Family Court, Muvattupuzha is hereby directed to release Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) to the Appellant herein, forthwith. K.HARILAL ANNIE JOHN kkj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial