Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohanan vs Lisha

Mohanan vs LISHA

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 31, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1900830

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/608/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohanan

Respondent

LISHA

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mr.justice t.v.anilkumar thursday, the 31st day of october 2019 / 9th karthika, 1941 mat.appeal.no.608 of 2013 against the order in ia 216/12 in op 840/2010 dated 14-09- 2012 of family court, irinjalakuda appellant/2nd petitioner: mohanan aged 62 years s/o madhavan, kadambakkaparambil house, perinjanam village, kodungallur taluk,thrissur district. by adv. sri.n.krishna prasad respondents/respondent & 1st petitioner:1 lisha aged 23 years d/o.ramakrishnan,kaithavalappil house, kaippamangalam.p.o,punnakachal desom, thrissur-686101. 2 shamil aged 28 years s/o.mohanan,kadambakkaparambil house, perinjanam village,kodungallur taluk, thrissur district,pin-686101. r1 by adv. sri.g.sreekumar chelur this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 31.10.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: c.m.appl.no.2152 of 2013 and mat.appeal no.608 of 2013 :-2-: dated this the 31st day of october, 2019j u d g m e n tshaffique, j.service of notice is not complete against the 2nd respondent. there is no appearance or representation for the appellant. hence, this appeal and the delay condonation application are dismissed for non prosecution. all pending interlocutory applications are closed. a.m.shaffique t.v.anilkumar ami/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1941 Mat.Appeal.No.608 OF 2013 AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA 216/12 IN OP 840/2010 DATED 14-09- 2012 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/2ND PETITIONER: MOHANAN AGED 62 YEARS S/O MADHAVAN, KADAMBAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERINJANAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.KRISHNA PRASAD RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT & 1ST PETITIONER:

1 LISHA AGED 23 YEARS D/O.RAMAKRISHNAN,KAITHAVALAPPIL HOUSE, KAIPPAMANGALAM.P.O,PUNNAKACHAL DESOM, THRISSUR-686101. 2 SHAMIL AGED 28 YEARS S/O.MOHANAN,KADAMBAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERINJANAM VILLAGE,KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-686101. R1 BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR CHELUR THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.M.Appl.No.2152 of 2013 and Mat.Appeal No.608 of 2013 :-2-: Dated this the 31st day of October, 2019

J U D G M E N T

SHAFFIQUE, J.

Service of notice is not complete against the 2nd respondent. There is no appearance or representation for the appellant. Hence, this appeal and the delay condonation application are dismissed for non prosecution. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. A.M.SHAFFIQUE T.V.ANILKUMAR ami/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial