M.Ravi Vs The Registrar

M.Ravi vs The Registrar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 24, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1900530

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1900530
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
Decided On: Jul 24, 2025
Case Number: WMP/14816/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Ravi

Respondent

The Registrar

Excerpt

in and (order of the court was made by hemant chandangoudar, j.,) this common order will now dispose of the captioned 'writ miscellaneous petitions' [hereinafter 'wmps' for the sake of brevity].2. captioned wmps have been filed with prayer to dispensewith production of 'order dated 26.06.2019 passed by the first respondent in shrc case.no.4013 of 2014' [hereinafter 'impugned orders' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].3. mr.m.velmurugan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners, is before this court.4. learned counsel for writ petitioners submits that the originalimpugned orders were not readily available with writ petitioners at the time of filing of captioned writ petitions and therefore, photocopies of the impugned orders were filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned wmps. and mk5. taking into account the fact that the authenticity of theimpugned orders is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.6. in the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. captioned wmps are ordered as prayed for. [m.s.j.,] [h.c.j.,] 24.07.2025 (2/2) mk in

Full Judgment

in and (Order of the Court was made by HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.,) This common order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petitions' [hereinafter 'WMPs' for the sake of brevity].

2. Captioned WMPs have been filed with prayer to dispense

with production of 'order dated 26.06.2019 passed by the first respondent in SHRC Case.No.4013 of 2014' [hereinafter 'impugned orders' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

3. Mr.M.Velmurugan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners, is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioners submits that the original

impugned orders were not readily available with writ petitioners at the time of filing of captioned writ petitions and therefore, photocopies of the impugned orders were filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMPs. and mk

5. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the

impugned orders is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMPs are ordered as prayed for. [M.S.J.,] [H.C.J.,] 24.07.2025 (2/2) mk in

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties M.Ravi vs The Registrar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant ...