Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.Anil vs Smithanath

C.ANIL vs Smithanath

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 09, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1900420

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/203/2011

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.ANIL

Respondent

Smithanath

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mrs. justice shircy v. wednesday,the 09th day of january 2019 / 19th pousha, 1940 mat.appeal.no. 203 of 2011 against the judgment in op 1223/2004 of family court, thiruvananthapuram dated 8.4.2009 appellant/petitioner: c.anil, s/o chandrasekharan, chandra vihar, paravila, pachalloor p.o., thiruvallam village, thiruvananthapuram. sri.s.rajeev sri.k.k.dheerendrakrishnan respondent/complainant: smithanath d/o.vasantha, pulloorkonam township colony, house no.317, vizhinjam p.o., thiruvananthapuram-695 521. sri.pirappancode v.s.sudhir sri.t.k.ananda krishnanthis matrimonial appeal having come up for admission on 09.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: c.m.appln.no.551/2011 in mat.a.no.203/2011 & mat.a.no.203/2011judgmentshaffique, j the learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the matter has already been settled between the parties, the appellant does not intend to proceed with the appeal. the application to condone delay and appeal are dismissed as not pressed. a.m.shaffique judge shircy v. kp true copy judge p.a. to judge.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. WEDNESDAY,THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 19TH POUSHA, 1940 Mat.Appeal.No. 203 of 2011 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 1223/2004 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 8.4.2009 APPELLANT/PETITIONER: C.ANIL, S/O CHANDRASEKHARAN, CHANDRA VIHAR, PARAVILA, PACHALLOOR P.O., THIRUVALLAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: SMITHANATH D/O.VASANTHA, PULLOORKONAM TOWNSHIP COLONY, HOUSE NO.317, VIZHINJAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 521. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR SRI.T.K.ANANDA KRISHNAN

THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.M.Appln.No.551/2011 in Mat.A.No.203/2011 & Mat.A.No.203/2011

JUDGMENT

SHAFFIQUE, J The learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the matter has already been settled between the parties, the appellant does not intend to proceed with the appeal. The application to condone delay and appeal are dismissed as not pressed. A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE SHIRCY V. kp True copy JUDGE P.A. To Judge.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial