Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

E.Sampath Kumar vs the State Rep by

E.Sampath Kumar vs The State Rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 08, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1900149

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/9412/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

E.Sampath Kumar

Respondent

The State Rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 08.01.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice p.velmurugan and crl.m.p.no.6120 of 2023 e.sampath kumar ... petitioner vs.1. the state, represented by inspector of police, district crime branch, chengalpattu, (fir in crime no.2 of 2023).2. k.raja ... respondentsprayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 cr.p.c./ 528 bnss 2023, to call for the records culminating in the impugned fir in crime no.2 of 2023, pending investigation on the file of the 1st respondent-police and quash the same. for petitioner : mr.arun anbumani for respondents : mr.s.sugendran additional public prosecutor for r1 mr.d.ashok kumar for r2orderthis criminal original petition is filed to quash the f.i.r. in crime no.2 of 2023 pending on the file of the first respondent-police.2. learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the firstrespondent-police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in crime no.2 of 2023, referred charge sheet vide r.c.s.no.9 of 2023 was filed before the learned judicial magistrate-ii, chengalpattu on 30.11.2023.3. in view of the above submission made by the learnedadditional public prosecutor, this criminal original petition is dismissed. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. index : yes/no neutral citation case : yes/no speaking order : yes/no ms to1. the judicial magistrate-ii,2. the inspector of police, district crime branch, 3.the public prosecutor, high court, madras. p.velmurugan, j ms

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.6120 of 2023 E.Sampath Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State, Represented by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Chengalpattu, (FIR in Crime No.2 of 2023).

2. K.Raja ... Respondents

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records culminating in the impugned FIR in Crime No.2 of 2023, pending investigation on the file of the 1st respondent-Police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Arun Anbumani For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 Mr.D.Ashok Kumar for R2

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.2 of 2023 pending on the file of the first respondent-Police.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first

respondent-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.2 of 2023, Referred Charge Sheet vide R.C.S.No.9 of 2023 was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu on 30.11.2023.

3. In view of the above submission made by the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To

1. The Judicial Magistrate-II,

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial