K.M.Pushpa vs Vinayan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 31, 2019

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1900038

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1900038
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice a.M.Shaffique,Honourable Mr.Justice T.V.Anilkumar
Decided On: Oct 31, 2019
Case Number: Mat.Appeal/431/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.M.Pushpa

Respondent

Vinayan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mr.justice t.v.anilkumar thursday, the 31st day of october 2019 / 9th karthika, 1941 against the judgment in op 107/2011 dated 04-12-2012 of family court, vatakara appellant/petitioner:k.m.pushpa aged 36 years d/o kannan, koyilothukandy meethal house, eramala, amsom, adiyoor desom, vatakara taluk by adv. sri.zubair pulikkool respondent/respondent: vinayan aged 38 years s/o achuthan, puliyullathil, eramala post, vatakara taluk, kozhikode dist. - 673501 this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 31.10.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: c.m.appl. no.1508/2013 in mat.appeal.no.431 of 2013 &judgmentdated this the 31st day of october 2019shaffique, j.though notice had been ordered in the case on 05.07.2013, steps had not been taken. learned counsel for the appellant sought for time to take steps. we do not think it necessary to show any further indulgence to the appellant. the petition to condone delay and mat. appeal are dismissed for non-prosecution. a.m.shaffique t.v.anilkumar skp true copy p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1941 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 107/2011 DATED 04-12-2012 OF FAMILY COURT, VATAKARA APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
K.M.PUSHPA AGED 36 YEARS D/O KANNAN, KOYILOTHUKANDY MEETHAL HOUSE, ERAMALA, AMSOM, ADIYOOR DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK BY ADV. SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: VINAYAN AGED 38 YEARS S/O ACHUTHAN, PULIYULLATHIL, ERAMALA POST, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DIST. - 673501 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.M.APPL. NO.1508/2013 IN Mat.Appeal.No.431 OF 2013 &

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of October 2019

SHAFFIQUE, J.

Though notice had been ordered in the case on 05.07.2013, steps had not been taken. Learned counsel for the appellant sought for time to take steps. We do not think it necessary to show any further indulgence to the appellant. The petition to condone delay and Mat. appeal are dismissed for non-prosecution. A.M.SHAFFIQUE T.V.ANILKUMAR SKP True Copy P.A. to Judge

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2019 Same Parties K.M.Pushpa vs Vinayan Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice a.M.Shaffique,Honourable Mr.Justice T.V...