Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

R.Venkatesan Vs State rep by

R.Venkatesan vs State rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 09, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1899839

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/10763/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R.Venkatesan

Respondent

State rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 09.04.2025coramthe hon'ble mr. justice sunder mohan 1.r.venkatesan 2.d.ramachandran 3.tamilselvi .. petitioners vs. the state rep by the inspector of of police, (crime no.not known of 2025) .. respondent prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in crime no.not known of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. for petitioner : m/s.deenadayalan for respondent : mr.s.balaji government advocate(crl.side) page no.1 of 4orderthe petitioners, who apprehend at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under section 498(a) and 506(i) of ipc, in connection with the case in crime no.not known of 2025, seek anticipatory bail. 2.the learned government advocate (crl.side) on instructions submitted that a petition enquiry is pending and an fir has not been registered.3. in view of the same, the respondent shall conduct and conclude theenquiry within a period of three weeks from today. if the petitioners' appearance is required, the respondent shall issue a notice under section 35 of bnss, 2023 and on such notice, the petitioners shall appear before the respondent. till the conclusion of the enquiry, the respondent police shall not arrest the petitioners.page no.2 of 44. with the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of. index : yes / no internet : yes / no dpa to 1.the inspector of of police, 2.the public prosecutor, madras high court, chennai. page no.3 of 4sunder mohan , j.dpa page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.04.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN 1.R.Venkatesan 2.D.Ramachandran 3.Tamilselvi .. Petitioners Vs. The State rep by The Inspector of of Police, (Crime No.Not known of 2025) .. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.Not known of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : M/s.Deenadayalan For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate(Crl.Side) Page No.1 of 4

ORDER

The petitioners, who apprehend at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 498(a) and 506(i) of IPC, in connection with the case in Crime No.Not known of 2025, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on instructions submitted that a petition enquiry is pending and an FIR has not been registered.

3. In view of the same, the respondent shall conduct and conclude the

enquiry within a period of three weeks from today. If the petitioners' appearance is required, the respondent shall issue a notice under Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 and on such notice, the petitioners shall appear before the respondent. Till the conclusion of the enquiry, the respondent police shall not arrest the petitioners.

Page No.2 of 4

4. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No dpa To 1.The Inspector of of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Page No.3 of 4

SUNDER MOHAN , J.

dpa Page No.4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial