S.Jaishankar Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

S.Jaishankar vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 29, 2025

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1899607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1899607
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan
Decided On: Apr 29, 2025
Case Number: CRL OP/11547/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Jaishankar

Respondent

The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

.....apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 406 and 420 of ipc in crime no.18 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.2. the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had received a sum ofrs.9.50/- lakhs from the defacto complainant promising to get a government job; and that the petitioner is a retired employee of the metropolitan transport corporation, chennai. hence, the case.3. learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner wasearlier granted anticipatory bail in crl.o.p.no.4312 of 2024 on 11.03.2024; that the petitioner failed to surrender and execute sureties as ordered by this court; and that the petitioner is now willing to comply with any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this court and sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.4. learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondentpolice, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, reiterated the case of the prosecution and on instructions submitted, that the petitioner had not complied with the conditions imposed by this court in crl.o.p.no.4312 of 2024 on 11.03.2024.5. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent, and perused the records.6. considering the fact that the petitioner has not complied with the conditions imposed by this court in crl.o.p.no.4312 of 2024 dated 11.03.2024, this court is not inclined to entertain this second petition.7. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. consequently, the connected criminal miscellaneous petition is closed. 29-04-2025 gbi index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the state rep. by the inspector of police, door no.46, kamarajarsalai, rc west minster, chennaim-1, madhavaram police station, chennai district. (crime no. 18 of 2024) sunder mohan j. gbi crl op no. 11547 of 29-04-2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-04-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN & Crl.MP.No.6465 of 2025

1. S.Jaishankar Son of G.Srinivasan, Door No.46, KamarajarSalai, RC West minster, Chennai - 600 052. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep. by the Inspector of

Police, M-1, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai District. (Crime No. 18 of 2024) Respondent(s) PRAYER To grant an Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest or on their appearance before any court in connection with the case in Crime No. 18 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent Police herein.

For Petitioner(s): C.P.Naresh Kumar S.Arun Kumar L.Meena C.M.Logeshwari M.Sathish Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.18 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had received a sum of

Rs.9.50/- lakhs from the defacto complainant promising to get a Government job; and that the petitioner is a retired employee of the Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Chennai. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was

earlier granted anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.No.4312 of 2024 on 11.03.2024; that the petitioner failed to surrender and execute sureties as ordered by this Court; and that the petitioner is now willing to comply with any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent

police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, reiterated the case of the prosecution and on instructions submitted, that the petitioner had not complied with the conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.4312 of 2024 on 11.03.2024.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, and perused the records.

6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has not complied with the conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.4312 of 2024 dated 11.03.2024, this Court is not inclined to entertain this second petition.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 29-04-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Door No.46, KamarajarSalai, RC West minster, ChennaiM-1, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai District. (Crime No. 18 of 2024) SUNDER MOHAN J. gbi CRL OP No. 11547 of 29-04-2025

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties S.Jaishankar vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan