Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Radhamani vs Karunakaran

Radhamani vs Karunakaran

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 31, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1899371

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/315/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Radhamani

Respondent

Karunakaran

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mr.justice t.v.anilkumar thursday, the 31st day of october 2019 / 9th karthika, 1941 against the order dated 25-02-2013 in op 174/2011 of family court, kalpetta appellant/petitioner:radhamani aged 60 years w/o.karanakaran,kulangarayil house, meenangadi post,purakkadi amsom desom, sulthan bathery taluk,wayanad district. by advs. smt.celine joseph sri. m.r. jayalath respondents/respondents: 1 karunakaran aged 63 years s/o.kutty,kulangarayil house, eangappuzha post,perumpally, puthuppadi village, kozhikode district,pin-673586. 2 radhamani aged 41 years chennakkottil house,manikavu, choothupara post-673596, purakkadi amsom,sulthan bathery taluk, wayanad district.r1 by adv. sri.m.p.ashok kumar r1 by adv. sri.p.c.gopinath r1 by adv. sri.nandagopal s.kurup this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 31.10.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 31st day of october 2019shaffique, j.it is submitted that the 1st respondent died. the appeal is filed against an order rejecting claim for return of gold ornaments and money. in so far as, the appellant is no more, and the legal heirs are wife and children, the appellant does not intend to proceed with the appeal. appeal is dismissed. a.m.shaffique t.v.anilkumar skp true copy p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25-02-2013 IN OP 174/2011 OF FAMILY COURT, KALPETTA APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

RADHAMANI AGED 60 YEARS W/O.KARANAKARAN,KULANGARAYIL HOUSE, MEENANGADI POST,PURAKKADI AMSOM DESOM, SULTHAN BATHERY TALUK,WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SMT.CELINE JOSEPH SRI. M.R. JAYALATH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 KARUNAKARAN AGED 63 YEARS S/O.KUTTY,KULANGARAYIL HOUSE, EANGAPPUZHA POST,PERUMPALLY, PUTHUPPADI VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,PIN-673586. 2 RADHAMANI AGED 41 YEARS CHENNAKKOTTIL HOUSE,MANIKAVU, CHOOTHUPARA POST-673596, PURAKKADI AMSOM,SULTHAN BATHERY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.GOPINATH R1 BY ADV. SRI.NANDAGOPAL S.KURUP THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of October 2019

SHAFFIQUE, J.

It is submitted that the 1st respondent died. The appeal is filed against an order rejecting claim for return of gold ornaments and money. In so far as, the appellant is no more, and the legal heirs are wife and children, the appellant does not intend to proceed with the appeal. Appeal is dismissed. A.M.SHAFFIQUE T.V.ANILKUMAR SKP True Copy P.A. To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial