Sudevan vs Dibi

Sudevan vs DIBI

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 30, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1899278

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1899278
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal,Honourable Mrs. Justice Annie John
Decided On: Sep 30, 2019
Case Number: Mat.Appeal/937/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sudevan

Respondent

DIBI

Excerpt

& mat.appeal.no.937 of 2015 against the judgment in op 890/2010 dated 27-02-2015 of family appellant/1st respondent: sudevan pulikkan house, cherukunnu desom, p.o.vettukad. respondents/petitioner & respondents 2 & 3: aged 29 years, d/o.narayanan, mambully house, pullu desom and p.o, thrissur, 680 001. 2 karthu kandukutty aged about 60 years, w/o.late kandukutty, 3 geetha aged about 39 years, d/o.late kandukutty, by adv. sri.c.a.chacko by adv. sri.sumodh madhavan nair30.09.2019, along with mat.appeal.1184/2015, the court on the same day delivered the following: mat.appeal nos.937/15 & 1184/2015 2 & mat.appeal.no.1184 of 2015 against the judgment in op 890/2010 dated 27.2.2015 of family appellants/2nd and 3rd respondents: 1 karthu kandukutty aged 60 years w/o.late kandukutty, pulikkan house,cherukunnu desom, p.o,vettukad.2 geetha aged 39 years d/o.late kandukutty, pulikkan house, pullu desom and p.o., thrissur-680001. respondents/petitioner & 1st respondent: aged 29 years d/o narayanan,mambully house, pullu desom.p.o,thrissur-680001. 2 sudevan s/o.late kandukutty,pulikkan house, cherukunnu desom, p.o.vettukad-680001. r1 by adv. sri.c.a.chacko 30.09.2019, along with mat.appeal.937/2015, the court on the same day delivered the following: mat.appeal nos.937/15 & 1184/2015 3judgmentk.harilal, j.the learned counsel for the appellants submits that these appeals are not pressed. in view of the said submission, these appeals would stand dismissed as not pressed. k.harilal, judge annie john, judge csl

Full Judgment

& Mat.Appeal.No.937 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 890/2010 DATED 27-02-2015 OF FAMILY APPELLANT/1st RESPONDENT: SUDEVAN PULIKKAN HOUSE, CHERUKUNNU DESOM, P.O.VETTUKAD. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 & 3: AGED 29 YEARS, D/O.NARAYANAN, MAMBULLY HOUSE, PULLU DESOM AND P.O, THRISSUR, 680 001. 2 KARTHU KANDUKUTTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY, 3 GEETHA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, D/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY, BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO BY ADV. SRI.SUMODH MADHAVAN NAIR
30.09.2019, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.1184/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mat.Appeal Nos.937/15 & 1184/2015 2 & Mat.Appeal.No.1184 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 890/2010 DATED 27.2.2015 OF FAMILY APPELLANTS/2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS: 1 KARTHU KANDUKUTTY AGED 60 YEARS W/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY, PULIKKAN HOUSE,CHERUKUNNU DESOM, P.O,VETTUKAD.

2 GEETHA AGED 39 YEARS D/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY, PULIKKAN HOUSE, PULLU DESOM AND P.O., THRISSUR-680001. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & 1ST RESPONDENT: AGED 29 YEARS D/O NARAYANAN,MAMBULLY HOUSE, PULLU DESOM.P.O,THRISSUR-680001. 2 SUDEVAN S/O.LATE KANDUKUTTY,PULIKKAN HOUSE, CHERUKUNNU DESOM, P.O.VETTUKAD-680001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO 30.09.2019, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.937/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mat.Appeal Nos.937/15 & 1184/2015 3

JUDGMENT

K.Harilal, J.

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that these appeals are not pressed. In view of the said submission, these appeals would stand dismissed as not pressed. K.HARILAL, JUDGE ANNIE JOHN, JUDGE csl

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2019 Same Parties Sudevan vs DIBI Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal,Honourable Mrs. Justice Annie...