Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Susmitha, vs Sasidharan,

Susmitha, vs Sasidharan,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 18, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1897944

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tr.P(C)/216/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Susmitha,

Respondent

Sasidharan,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan wednesday, the 18th day of december 2019 / 27th agrahayana, 1941 against the order/judgment in op 766/2018 of family court, ottappalam petitioner/respondent:susmitha, aged 28 years d/o.k.r.mohanan, kopparambath, padinjattumuri, kadavallur p.o., thrissur district, pin - 680 543. by advs. sri.k.n.abhilash sri.sunil nair palakkat respondent/petitioner: sasidharan, aged 34 years s/o.late ayyappan @ appu, residing at vadakkekalathil, paruthur p.o., pattambi, palakkad district, pin - 679 505. this transfer petition (civil) having been finally heard on 18.12.2019, the court on the same day passed the following:sathish ninan, j.============================== tr.p.(c) no.216 of 2019 ========================== dated this the 18th day of december, 2019orderpetitioner - wife seeks for transfer of o.p no.766 of 2018 pending on the files of the family court, ottapalam to the family court, thrissur.2. despite service of notice there is no appearance for the respondent - husband.3. the petitioner is a resident of thrissur.there are three children born in the wedlock, who are minors and are presently in the custody of the petitioner. there is another proceeding between the parties as m.c no.177 of 2019 before the family court, thrissur. considering the circumstances, i am of the opinion that the transfer as sought for can be granted. in the result, the transfer petition is allowed. o.p no.766 of 2018 pending on the files of family court, ottapalam will stand withdrawn and transferred to the family court, thrissur. sd/- sathish ninan, judge vdv appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure a1 true copy of m.c.no.177/2019 filed by the petitioner on the files of the family court, thrissur. annexure a2 the true copy of the original petition no.766/2018 on the files of family court, ottapalam, palakkad filed by the respondent. min

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 766/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

SUSMITHA, AGED 28 YEARS D/O.K.R.MOHANAN, KOPPARAMBATH, PADINJATTUMURI, KADAVALLUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 543. BY ADVS. SRI.K.N.ABHILASH SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: SASIDHARAN, AGED 34 YEARS S/O.LATE AYYAPPAN @ APPU, RESIDING AT VADAKKEKALATHIL, PARUTHUR P.O., PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 505. THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Sathish Ninan, J.

============================== Tr.P.(C) No.216 of 2019 ========================== Dated this the 18th day of December, 2019

ORDER

Petitioner - wife seeks for transfer of O.P No.766 of 2018 pending on the files of the Family Court, Ottapalam to the Family Court, Thrissur.

2. Despite service of notice there is no appearance for the respondent - husband.

3. The petitioner is a resident of Thrissur.

There are three children born in the wedlock, who are minors and are presently in the custody of the petitioner. There is another proceeding between the parties as M.C No.177 of 2019 before the Family Court, Thrissur. Considering the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the transfer as sought for can be granted. In the result, the transfer petition is allowed. O.P No.766 of 2018 pending on the files of Family Court, Ottapalam will stand withdrawn and transferred to the Family Court, Thrissur. Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge vdv APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF M.C.NO.177/2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION NO.766/2018 ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD FILED BY THE RESPONDENT. MIN

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial