Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Rajkumar vs the Inspector General of Prison

S.Rajkumar vs The Inspector General of Prison

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 27, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1896508

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/12415/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Rajkumar

Respondent

The Inspector General of Prison

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 27.06.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice m.s.ramesh and the honourable mr. justice v.lakshminarayanan s.rajkumar ... petitioner vs. puzhal, chennai - 66 ... respondentsprayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records no.726119/tha.ku.2/2025 dated 14.02.2025 passed by respondent no.2, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant 28 days ordinary leave to the petitioner's brother namely ranjithkumar, s/o.shankar, aged 28 years, ct.no.10147, (pid281827), convict prisoner, now confined in the central prison-1, puzhal, chennai-66. for petitioner : mr.p.pugalenthi for respondents : mr.e.raj thilak additional public prosecutororderand the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this court to withdraw this petition. he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.2. in view of the submission and endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [m.s.r, j.] [v.l.n, j.] kas to puzhal, chennai - 66 3.the public prosecutor high court of madras chennai and kas

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.06.2025

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN S.Rajkumar ... Petitioner Vs. Puzhal, Chennai - 66 ... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records No.726119/Tha.Ku.2/2025 dated 14.02.2025 passed by respondent No.2, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant 28 days ordinary leave to the petitioner's brother namely Ranjithkumar, S/o.Shankar, aged 28 years, CT.No.10147, (PID

281827), Convict Prisoner, now confined in the Central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai-66. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

AND The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R, J.] [V.L.N, J.] kas To Puzhal, Chennai - 66 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai and kas

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial