Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abhilash Mumar vs S. Sunil

Abhilash Mumar vs S. Sunil

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 04, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1896113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (MAC)/93/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abhilash Mumar

Respondent

S. Sunil

Excerpt

op (mac).no.88 of 2018(o) against the order dated 22.6.2018 in e.a.no.156/2018 in e.p.no.48/2018 in op(mv)no.534/2011 of the motor accidents claims tribunal, attingal 1 s. sunil vilabhagom, varkala, thiruvananthapuram. 2 aneeshkumar s/o. sasidharan pillai, this op (mac) having been finally heard on 04.12.2019, along with op (mac).93/2018(o), the court on the same day delivered the following: -2- op (mac).no.93 of 2018 against the order dated 29.6.2018 in i.a.no.8458/2017 in op(mv) 1 s. sunil, vilabhagom, varkala, 2 aneeshkumar, s/o.s asidharan pillai, this op (mac) having been finally heard on 04.12.2019, along with op (mac).88/2018(o), the court on the same day delivered the following: -3-judgment[ op (mac no.88/2018, op (mac)no.93/2018 ] dated this the 4th day of december 2019 the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is not pressed. accordingly, these original petitions are dismissed as not pressed. sd/- a.muhamed mustaque judge akv

Full Judgment

OP (MAC).No.88 OF 2018(O) AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.6.2018 IN E.A.NO.156/2018 IN E.P.NO.48/2018 IN OP(MV)NO.534/2011 OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, ATTINGAL 1 S. SUNIL VILABHAGOM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2 ANEESHKUMAR S/O. SASIDHARAN PILLAI, THIS OP (MAC) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.12.2019, ALONG WITH OP (MAC).93/2018(O), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2- OP (MAC).No.93 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.6.2018 IN I.A.NO.8458/2017 IN OP(MV) 1 S. SUNIL, VILABHAGOM, VARKALA, 2 ANEESHKUMAR, S/O.S ASIDHARAN PILLAI, THIS OP (MAC) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.12.2019, ALONG WITH OP (MAC).88/2018(O), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

JUDGMENT

[ OP (MAC No.88/2018, OP (MAC)No.93/2018 ] Dated this the 4th day of December 2019 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is not pressed. Accordingly, these original petitions are dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE akv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial