Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Antony Davit Vs state Rep. by

Antony Davit vs state Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 08, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1894641

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/10525/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Antony Davit

Respondent

state Rep. by

Excerpt

.....advocate [criminal side]orderthe petitioner / accused, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 406, 420 and 506(i) of ipc in connection with the case in crime no.not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.2. today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner.3. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl. side) appearing for the respondent police.4. considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent policehas to issue notice under section 35 of bnss, 2023 to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the investigating officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following theprocedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the f.i.r or close the petition enquiry within a period of three (3) weeks from the date on which the order copy is made ready. the parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. it is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry, on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.5. with the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of. mjs to 1.the public prosecutor, high court, madras. 2.the station house officer,sriperumbudur police station,kanchipuram district. sunder mohan. j., mjs

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 08.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

Antony Davit S/o. Raja ... Petitioner / Accused Vs State rep. by:- The Station House Officer, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Kanchipuram District. ... Respondent [Cr. No.Not known of 2025] PRAYER: - The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner / Accused in Crime No.Not known of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. K. Karuppaiya Moopanar For Respondent : Mr. S. Santhosh, Government Advocate [Criminal side]

ORDER

The petitioner / Accused, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 406, 420 and 506(i) of IPC in connection with the case in Crime No.Not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent Police

has to issue notice under Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent Police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the

procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of three (3) weeks from the date on which the order copy is made ready. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry, on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.

5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. mjs To 1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 2.The Station House Officer,Sriperumbudur Police Station,Kanchipuram District. SUNDER MOHAN. J., mjs

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Antony Davit vs state Rep. by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales