Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishnan vs Bindu

Krishnan vs BINDU

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 31, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1894160

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/735/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnan

Respondent

BINDU

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mr.justice t.v.anilkumar thursday, the 31st day of october 2019 / 9th karthika, 1941 mat.appeal.no.735 of 2012 against the order dated 31.01.2012 in i.a. no.687 & 688 of 2011 in op 387/2010 of family court, thodupuzha appellant/ respondent no.2: krishnan, s/o.kunjan, aged 70 years, thayil house, olamattom kara, thodupuzha by advs.sri.s.ananthakrishnan sri.n.k.subramanian respondents/ petitioner & respondent no.11 bindu d/o.ayyappan, ponthanveettil house, kolapra kara, kudayathoor village,idukki district- 685 584. 2 sunil kumar thayil house, olamattom kara, thodupuzha 685 584. r1 by adv. sri.domson j.vattakuzhy this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 31.10.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: m.a.no.735/2012 -:2:-judgmentdated this the 31st day of october 2019a.m. shaffique, j.it is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant and respondent that the matter has already been settled and there is no necessity to interfere with the judgment as such. mat.appeal is dismissed as settled. a.m.shaffique,judge t.v.anilkumar,judge dst //true copy// p.a.to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1941 Mat.Appeal.No.735 OF 2012 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.01.2012 IN I.A. NO.687 & 688 OF 2011 IN OP 387/2010 OF FAMILY COURT, THODUPUZHA APPELLANT/ RESPONDENT NO.2: KRISHNAN, S/O.KUNJAN, AGED 70 YEARS, THAYIL HOUSE, OLAMATTOM KARA, THODUPUZHA BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER & RESPONDENT NO.1

1 BINDU D/O.AYYAPPAN, PONTHANVEETTIL HOUSE, KOLAPRA KARA, KUDAYATHOOR VILLAGE,IDUKKI DISTRICT- 685 584. 2 SUNIL KUMAR THAYIL HOUSE, OLAMATTOM KARA, THODUPUZHA 685 584. R1 BY ADV. SRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.A.No.735/2012 -:2:-

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of October 2019

A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant and respondent that the matter has already been settled and there is no necessity to interfere with the judgment as such. Mat.Appeal is dismissed as settled. A.M.SHAFFIQUE,JUDGE T.V.ANILKUMAR,JUDGE DST //True copy// P.A.To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial