Banumathi K. vs T.Vinodkumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 26, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1894050

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1894050
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice a.M.Shaffique,Honourable Mr.Justice N.Anil Kumar
Decided On: Jul 26, 2019
Case Number: Mat.Appeal/692/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Banumathi K.

Respondent

T.Vinodkumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mr.justice n.anil kumar friday, the 26th day of july 2019 / 4th sravana, 1941 mat.appeal.no.692 of 2012 against the judgment in op 709/2008 of family court, palakkad dated 28-04-2009 appellant/petitioner: banumathi k. aged 51 years, w/o.v.thankavelu, 16/385, near village office, main road, nallepully, chittur taluk, palakkad district, now residing at 304-b, ganapathi flat, mandapakam, chennai-97. by adv. smt.vanaja madhavan respondent/respondent: t.vinodkumar aged 31 years, s/o.thankavelu, technical sports officer, h.c.l.technologies limited, near ethiraj college, mount road, chennai now residing at 31-a, ist main road, maruthi nagar, chennai-600077. this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 26.07.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: c.m.appln.no.2876/12 in mat.appeal no.692/12 & mat.appeal no.692/12 -:2:-judgmentshaffique, j.though notice in the delay petition as well as notice on admission in the appeal was ordered as early as on 19/11/2012, so far, no steps had been taken to serve notice. today when the case is taken up, there is no appearance or representation for the appellant. hence, the application to condone delay and the appeal are dismissed for non-prosecution. a.m.shaffique judge n.anil kumar rp judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1941 Mat.Appeal.No.692 of 2012 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 709/2008 of FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD DATED 28-04-2009 APPELLANT/PETITIONER: BANUMATHI K. AGED 51 YEARS, W/O.V.THANKAVELU, 16/385, NEAR VILLAGE OFFICE, MAIN ROAD, NALLEPULLY, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT 304-B, GANAPATHI FLAT, MANDAPAKAM, CHENNAI-97. BY ADV. SMT.VANAJA MADHAVAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: T.VINODKUMAR AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.THANKAVELU, TECHNICAL SPORTS OFFICER, H.C.L.TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, NEAR ETHIRAJ COLLEGE, MOUNT ROAD, CHENNAI NOW RESIDING AT 31-A, IST MAIN ROAD, MARUTHI NAGAR, CHENNAI-600077. THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.M.Appln.No.2876/12 in Mat.Appeal No.692/12 & Mat.Appeal No.692/12 -:2:-

JUDGMENT

Shaffique, J.

Though notice in the delay petition as well as notice on admission in the appeal was ordered as early as on 19/11/2012, so far, no steps had been taken to serve notice. Today when the case is taken up, there is no appearance or representation for the appellant. Hence, the application to condone delay and the appeal are dismissed for non-prosecution. A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE N.ANIL KUMAR Rp JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2019 Same Parties Banumathi K. vs T.Vinodkumar Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice a.M.Shaffique,Honourable Mr.Justice N.A...