Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayasree vs Somanathan

Jayasree vs Somanathan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 09, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1893983

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/655/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayasree

Respondent

Somanathan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mrs. justice shircy v. wednesday,the 09th day of january 2019 / 19th pousha, 1940 mat.appeal.no. 655 of 2012 against the judgment in ophma 208/2005 of family court, alappuzha dated 01-07-2009 appellant/1st respondent: jayasree, aged 35 years daughter of njanakumari, palakattil house, muttam muri, cheppadu village. sri.a.n.rajan babu sri.a.r.easwar lal sri.p.gopalakrishnan (mva) respondents/petitioenr & 2nd respondent:1 somanathan aged 45 years s/o.damodhara panicker, valiyatharayil house, puthuppally north muri, puthuppally village, pin-686 011. 2 girish kumar aged 30 years s/o. lakshmanan, palakkattil house, muttam muri cheppad village, pin-690 507. sri.s.naushad sri.r.suraj kumar sri.sunil j.chakkalackal this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 09.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: c.m.appln.no.2722/2012 in mat.a.no.655/2012 & mat.a.no.655/2012judgmentshaffique, j though direction was issued to take out substituted service to the 1st respondent, so far no steps had been taken. the application to condone delay and appeal are dismissed for non prosecution. a.m.shaffique judge shircy v. kp true copy judge p.a. to judge.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. WEDNESDAY,THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 19TH POUSHA, 1940 Mat.Appeal.No. 655 of 2012 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OPHMA 208/2005 of FAMILY COURT, ALAPPUZHA DATED 01-07-2009 APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT: JAYASREE, AGED 35 YEARS DAUGHTER OF NJANAKUMARI, PALAKATTIL HOUSE, MUTTAM MURI, CHEPPADU VILLAGE. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU SRI.A.R.EASWAR LAL SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN (MVA) RESPONDENTS/PETITIOENR & 2ND RESPONDENT:

1 SOMANATHAN AGED 45 YEARS S/O.DAMODHARA PANICKER, VALIYATHARAYIL HOUSE, PUTHUPPALLY NORTH MURI, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE, PIN-686 011. 2 GIRISH KUMAR AGED 30 YEARS S/O. LAKSHMANAN, PALAKKATTIL HOUSE, MUTTAM MURI CHEPPAD VILLAGE, PIN-690 507. SRI.S.NAUSHAD SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SRI.SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.M.Appln.No.2722/2012 in Mat.A.No.655/2012 & Mat.A.No.655/2012

JUDGMENT

SHAFFIQUE, J Though direction was issued to take out substituted service to the 1st respondent, so far no steps had been taken. The application to condone delay and appeal are dismissed for non prosecution. A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE SHIRCY V. kp True copy JUDGE P.A. To Judge.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial