Jayan vs Sheena

JAYAN vs Sheena

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 30, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1892771

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1892771
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice a.M.Shaffique,Honourable Mr.Justice N.Anil Kumar
Decided On: May 30, 2019
Case Number: Mat.Appeal/293/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JAYAN

Respondent

Sheena

Excerpt

.....in op 55/2011 of family court, kottayam dated 09-05-2011 appellant/s: jayan, s/o. late sukumaran, kuravilangadu village, kottayam district. sri.k.m.varghese sri.p.j.balachandran respondent/s: 1 sheena, d/o. sukumaran, pulimoottil house, kumarakom village, kottayam taluk, pin- 686563.2 krishnapriya (monor) d/o. sheena, pulimoottil house, kumarakom village, kottayam taluk, pin 686563. -4- 3 vishnu (minor) s/o.sheena, pulimoottil house, kumarakom village, kottayam district-686563.(minor respondents 2 and 3 represented by their mother sheena, 1st respondent). smt.a.parvathi menon sri.p.sanjay this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 30.05.2019, along with mat.appeal.819/2011, the court on the same day delivered the following: -5-judgment[mat.appeal 819/2011, mat.appeal.293/2012]shaffique, j.it is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the subject matter of the appeals have already been settled out of court. the mat. appeals are, therefore, dismissed as settled. if at all the parties require any further orders regarding vacating of the order of attachment, it shall be open for them to approach the family court. sd/- a.m.shaffique judge sd/- n.anil kumar judge das

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1941 Mat.Appeal.No. 819 of 2011 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 799/2010 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM APPELLANT/S: 1 JAYAN, S/O. LATE SUKUMARAN, KURAVILANGADU VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, 2 THANKAMMA, W/O. LATE SUKUMARAN, KURAVILANGADU VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, 3 MINI W/O. RAJAPPAN, KOLLAMATEEL, VALAYAMKOTTU BHAGOM, KAPPUMTHALA KARA,, SRI.K.M.VARGHESE SRI.P.J.BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 SHEENA, D/O. SUKUMARAN, PULIMOOTIL HOUSE,, KUMARAKOM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK - 686 563. -2-
2 KRISHNAPRIYA (MINOR) AGED 13 YEARS, D/O. SHEENA, PULIMOOTIL HOUSE,, KUMARAKOM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK - 686 563., REPRESENTED BY SHEENA. SRI.GLEN ANTONY SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON SMT.M.VANAJA SRI.P.SANJAY THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.05.2019, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.293/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1941 Mat.Appeal.No. 293 of 2012 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 55/2011 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM DATED 09-05-2011 APPELLANT/S: JAYAN, S/O. LATE SUKUMARAN, KURAVILANGADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. SRI.K.M.VARGHESE SRI.P.J.BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 SHEENA, D/O. SUKUMARAN, PULIMOOTTIL HOUSE, KUMARAKOM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, PIN- 686563.

2 KRISHNAPRIYA (MONOR) D/O. SHEENA, PULIMOOTTIL HOUSE, KUMARAKOM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, PIN 686563. -4- 3 VISHNU (MINOR) S/O.SHEENA, PULIMOOTTIL HOUSE, KUMARAKOM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686563.(MINOR RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER SHEENA, 1ST RESPONDENT). SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON SRI.P.SANJAY THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.05.2019, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.819/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -5-

JUDGMENT

[Mat.Appeal 819/2011, Mat.Appeal.293/2012]

Shaffique, J.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the subject matter of the appeals have already been settled out of Court. The Mat. Appeals are, therefore, dismissed as settled. If at all the parties require any further orders regarding vacating of the order of attachment, it shall be open for them to approach the Family Court. Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE Sd/- N.ANIL KUMAR JUDGE das

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2019 Same Parties JAYAN vs Sheena Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice a.M.Shaffique,Honourable Mr.Justice N.A...