Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Juliet Jacob vs Jacob Thomas

Juliet Jacob vs Jacob Thomas

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 03, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1892169

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/24/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Juliet Jacob

Respondent

Jacob Thomas

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice a.m.shaffique & the honourable mr.justice n.anil kumar monday, the 03rd day of june 2019 / 13th jyaishta, 1941 against the order/judgment in o.p.no.1113/2007 of family court, thiruvananthapuram dated 28-03-2011 appellant:petitioner:juliet jacob, d/o.seraphine, seraphine barnabas, chakkalavilakom, mudicode, cherinniyoor.p.o., varkala, thiruvananthapuram, now residing at ponnara bungalow, pettah.p.o., thiruvananthapuram. by advs. sri.b.mohan lal sri.a.sanil kumar respondent: jacob thomas, s/o.m.j.thomas, rekhi roadlines, 14/8/216, choodi bazar, hydrabad-500 012, from manpurathu bunglow, palode, pacha.p.o., thiruvananthapuram district. this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 03.06.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmenta.m.shaffique, j.the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent is no more. no steps have been taken for impleading the legal heirs. the mat.appeal is hence dismissed as abated. a.m.shaffique, n.anil kumar, skj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR MONDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN O.P.No.1113/2007 OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 28-03-2011 APPELLANT:PETITIONER:

JULIET JACOB, D/O.SERAPHINE, SERAPHINE BARNABAS, CHAKKALAVILAKOM, MUDICODE, CHERINNIYOOR.P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOW RESIDING AT PONNARA BUNGALOW, PETTAH.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.B.MOHAN LAL SRI.A.SANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT: JACOB THOMAS, S/O.M.J.THOMAS, REKHI ROADLINES, 14/8/216, CHOODI BAZAR, HYDRABAD-500 012, FROM MANPURATHU BUNGLOW, PALODE, PACHA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

A.M.Shaffique, J.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent is no more. No steps have been taken for impleading the legal heirs. The Mat.Appeal is hence dismissed as abated. A.M.SHAFFIQUE, N.ANIL KUMAR, skj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial