Shaik Umar vs State of Karnataka by

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided May 30, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1890982

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1890982
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M.Nagaprasanna
Decided On: May 30, 2024
Case Number: CRL.P/3407/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shaik Umar

Respondent

State of Karnataka by

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 30th day of may, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice m.nagaprasanna criminal petition no. 3407 of 2022 between:1. shaik umar s/o shaik hanan aged about 23 years.2. shaik hannan s/o late shaik haider aged about 45 years.3. rehana w/o shaik hannan aged about 43 years petitioner no.1 to 3 are residing at no. 62 digitally signedby nagaveni thanisandra main road location: high opp. monarch apt court of bengaluru - 560 077. karnataka …petitioners(by sri. syed ummer., advocate) and:1. state of karnataka by women’s police station mandya town, mandya city mandya - 571 401 represented by senior prosecutor -2- high court of karnataka bengaluru - 560 001.2. syed umme hani d/o syed nasir aged about 21 years presently r/at no. 479/2 jabbar circle nalabandavadi, 1st cross mandya city, mandya - 571 401. …respondents(by sri. p. thejesh, hcgp for r1) this crl.p is filed u/s 482 of the cr.p.c., pleased to quash the proceedings in cr.no.01/2022 for the offence p/u/s 498a, 323, 504, 506, 354a, 354d r/w 34 of ipc and sec.3 and 4 of d.p act, pending before the honble addl.civil judge (jr.dn) and j.m.f.c at mandya. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:orderlearned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking leave of this court to withdraw the petition. memo is placed on record. -3- in view of the memo filed, petition is disposed as withdrawn. consequently, i.a.no.1 of 2022 also stands disposed. sd/- judge bkp list no.: 1 sl no.: 36 ct:ss

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3407 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
1. SHAIK UMAR S/O SHAIK HANAN AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS.
2. SHAIK HANNAN S/O LATE SHAIK HAIDER AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
3. REHANA W/O SHAIK HANNAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 62 Digitally signed
by NAGAVENI              THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD
Location: HIGH           OPP. MONARCH APT
COURT OF                 BENGALURU - 560 077.
KARNATAKA                                                      …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SYED UMMER., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY WOMEN’S POLICE STATION MANDYA TOWN, MANDYA CITY MANDYA - 571 401 REPRESENTED BY SENIOR PROSECUTOR -2- HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. SYED UMME HANI D/O SYED NASIR AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 479/2 JABBAR CIRCLE NALABANDAVADI, 1ST CROSS MANDYA CITY, MANDYA - 571 401. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P. THEJESH, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF THE CR.P.C., PLEASED TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.01/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354A, 354D R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT, PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND J.M.F.C AT MANDYA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition. Memo is placed on record. -3- In view of the memo filed, petition is disposed as withdrawn. Consequently, I.A.No.1 of 2022 also stands disposed. Sd/- JUDGE BKP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36 CT:SS

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Shaik Umar vs State of Karnataka by Same Judge M.Nagaprasanna