Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shoukathali vs the Secretary

Shoukathali vs The Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 31, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1890330

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/9528/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shoukathali

Respondent

The Secretary

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque thursday, the 31st day of october 2019 / 9th karthika, petitioner: shoukathali, aged 34 years, ponkulthil house, karuvarakundu p.o., malappuram. by adv. sri.i.dinesh menon respondents: 1 the secretary, regional transport authority, malappuram 676 505. 2 muhammed, kizhakkuparamba house, kadambode p.o., malappuram 676 521. srgp sheeja c s this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31.10.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmentthe counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition. taking note of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.sd/- a.muhamed mustaque judge pr ..3.. appendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the permit of the petitioner exhibit p2 true copy of the proceedings dated 18.2.1999 exhibit p3 true copy of the proceedings dated 19.9.2018 exhibit p4 true copy of the order in mvarp no. exhibit p5 true copy of the notice dated 5.3.2019. exhibit p6 true copy of the request dated 16.3.2019.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH KARTHIKA, PETITIONER: SHOUKATHALI, AGED 34 YEARS, PONKULTHIL HOUSE, KARUVARAKUNDU P.O., MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS: 1 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM 676 505. 2 MUHAMMED, KIZHAKKUPARAMBA HOUSE, KADAMBODE P.O., MALAPPURAM 676 521. SRGP SHEEJA C S THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

The Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition. Taking note of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE PR ..3.. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT OF THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 18.2.1999 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 19.9.2018 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN MVARP NO. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 5.3.2019. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 16.3.2019.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial