Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri Narayanappa vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Narayanappa vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Mar 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1889471

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/7637/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Narayanappa

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....s/o late babasab aged about 74 years nelamanala taluk -3-9. smt rukshana tajd/o sri b abdul wahid aged about 40 years nelamangala taluk-562123 …respondents (by sri. manjunatha.k., hcgp for r-1; sri.s.n.sangolli, advocate for r-2 & r-3) this writ petition is filed under artcles 226 and227 of the constitution of india, praying to directing the respondent no.3 to consider his representation dated 15-02-2022 annexure-c and not to disburse the compensation amount during the pendency of suit in os no.227/2015 on the file of senior civil judge nelamangala and further be pleased to order to refer the matter for deciding the right, title and interest of petitioner in respect of compensation amount for sy no.47/p20, new sy no.244 measuring 1 acre 16 guntas situated atobalapura village, tyamagondlu hobli, nelamagangala taluk, bengaluru district acquired by him to the competent civil court/authority under the land acquisition act, etc. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:order1. the memo is filed by learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties and hence, the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. -4-2. accepting the said memo, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- judge hnm list no.: 1 sl no.: 18

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 7637 OF 2022 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:

1. SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R.AT NO.268 18TH CROSS RUDRAMMA BUILDING SHIVAPURA, PEENYA POST BANGALORE-571429. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEGDE SHRIPAD GANGADHAR., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY M S BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDI Digitally BANGALORE-560001. signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location:

2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA HIGH DEVELOPMENT BOARD COURT OF KARNATAKA NO.39, SHANTHINAGARA BANGALORE-01 BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE SPL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-I OFFICE OF KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO.39 SHANTHIGRUHA -2- BANGALORE-01.

4. SRI RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT OBALAPURA VILLAGE NELAMANGALA TALUK

5. SRI LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT HOSA HUDYA, KASABA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK-561203

6. SRI DR M KRISHNAMURTHY S/O MAYANNA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT E-207 MANTHRI TOWERS BILEKHALLI, BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-76.

7. SRI T R VISHWANATH S/O T N RAHJANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.395 7TH MAIN RAJAJINAGAR 2ND STAGE MALLESHWARAM WEST POST BANGALORE-560003.

8. SRI B ABDUL WAHID S/O LATE BABASAB AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS NELAMANALA TALUK -3-

9. SMT RUKSHANA TAJ

D/O SRI B ABDUL WAHID AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS NELAMANGALA TALUK-562123 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA.K., HCGP FOR R-1; SRI.S.N.SANGOLLI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTCLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER HIS REPRESENTATION DATED 15-02-2022 ANNEXURE-C AND NOT TO DISBURSE THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT DURING THE PENDENCY OF SUIT IN OS NO.227/2015 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE NELAMANGALA AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ORDER TO REFER THE MATTER FOR DECIDING THE RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF COMPENSATION AMOUNT FOR SY NO.47/P20, NEW SY NO.244 MEASURING 1 ACRE 16 GUNTAS SITUATED AT

OBALAPURA VILLAGE, TYAMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMAGANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT ACQUIRED BY HIM TO THE COMPETENT CIVIL COURT/AUTHORITY UNDER THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

1. The Memo is filed by learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties and hence, the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. -4-

2. Accepting the said Memo, Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial