Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Subhadra vs P.V.Varghese

Subhadra vs P.V.Varghese

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 12, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1889294

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Ex.SA/9/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subhadra

Respondent

P.V.Varghese

Excerpt

ex.s.a. no.9 of 2012 1in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan thursday, the 12th day of december 2019 / 21st agrahayana, 1941 ex.sa.no.9 of 2012 (against the judgment and decree dated 08-12-2011 in as 220/2009of i additional district court, kollam and orderdated 12-12-2002 in e.a.no.100/1999 in os 214/1990 of munsiff court, punalur) appellant/appellant/petitioner: subhadra, aged 50 years d/o.parukutty, residing at manju bhavan, kadakkamon, punnala village, pathanapuram taluk. by advs. smt.k.g.bindu smt.t.s.maya (thiyadil) respondent/respondent/decree holder: p.v.varghese s/o.p.b. varghese, kailath veedu, kizhakke muri, punnala village, pathanapuram taluk. r1 by adv. smt.anju anilkumar r1 by adv. smt.bindumol joseph r1 by adv. sri.b.s.syamanthak r1 by adv. sri.b.shamnad this execution second appeal having come up for admission on 12.12.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: ex.s.a. no.9 of 2012 2sathish ninan, j.------------------------------------- ex.s.a. no.9 of 2012 --------------------------------------- dated: 12th december, 2019judgmentthe counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal is not pressed. recording the submission of the learned counsel, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- sathish ninan, judge ss

Full Judgment

EX.S.A. No.9 of 2012 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA, 1941 Ex.SA.No.9 OF 2012 (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08-12-2011 IN AS 220/2009

OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM AND ORDER

DATED 12-12-2002 IN E.A.No.100/1999 IN OS 214/1990 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PUNALUR) APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SUBHADRA, AGED 50 YEARS D/O.PARUKUTTY, RESIDING AT MANJU BHAVAN, KADAKKAMON, PUNNALA VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK. BY ADVS. SMT.K.G.BINDU SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL) RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER: P.V.VARGHESE S/O.P.B. VARGHESE, KAILATH VEEDU, KIZHAKKE MURI, PUNNALA VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK. R1 BY ADV. SMT.ANJU ANILKUMAR R1 BY ADV. SMT.BINDUMOL JOSEPH R1 BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SYAMANTHAK R1 BY ADV. SRI.B.SHAMNAD THIS EXECUTION SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: EX.S.A. No.9 of 2012 2

SATHISH NINAN, J.

------------------------------------- EX.S.A. No.9 of 2012 --------------------------------------- Dated: 12th December, 2019

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal is not pressed. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- SATHISH NINAN, JUDGE ss

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial