Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M.James vs R.Vijayalekshmi Devi,

M.James vs R.Vijayalekshmi Devi,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 19, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1888823

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/308/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.James

Respondent

R.Vijayalekshmi Devi,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice k.harilal & the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias thursday, the 19th day of december 2019 / 28th agrahayana, 1941 against the judgment in rcrev. 418/2017 dated 8.10.2018 of high court of kerala review petitioner/s: m.james aged 46 years s/o.mathai onnunni, charuvila puthen veedu, pannivizha, adoor village. by advs. sri.kurian george kannanthanam (sr.) sri.tony george kannanthanam sri.thomas george respondent/s:r.vijayalekshmi devi, w/o.late dr.somasekhara pillai, residing at edackattuputhen veedu, vettippuzha south, punaloor village, pathanapuram taluk, kollam district- 691002. this review petition having been finally heard on 19.12.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: ..2..judgmentdated this the 19th day of december 2019k.harilal,j.the learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to press the review petition. submission is recorded and the review petition would stand dismissed as not pressed. k.harilal judge c.s.dias sb/20/12/2019 judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCRev. 418/2017 DATED 8.10.2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/S: M.JAMES AGED 46 YEARS S/O.MATHAI ONNUNNI, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PANNIVIZHA, ADOOR VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.) SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM SRI.THOMAS GEORGE RESPONDENT/S:

R.VIJAYALEKSHMI DEVI, W/O.LATE DR.SOMASEKHARA PILLAI, RESIDING AT EDACKATTUPUTHEN VEEDU, VETTIPPUZHA SOUTH, PUNALOOR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT- 691002. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 19th day of December 2019

K.HARILAL,J.

The learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to press the review petition. Submission is recorded and the review petition would stand dismissed as not pressed. K.HARILAL JUDGE C.S.DIAS SB/20/12/2019 JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial