Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Devaraj D M vs the State of Karnataka

Devaraj D M vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Mar 27, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1888418

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/7745/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devaraj D M

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....bangalore-01.2. the state of karnataka urban development department 4th floor, bangalore-560001.3. bangalore international airport areaplanning authority(biaapa) no.333/1, ist floor v j complex sulibele road devanahalli town bangalore rural district bangalore-562110 represented by member secretary. -3-4. bangalore metropolitan region development authority(bmrda) no.1, ali askar road vasanth nagar bangalore-560052 represented by its commissioner.5. sri v shanth kumars/o late venkateshappa aged about 44 years jalige post devanahalli taluk …respondents (by sri.naveen chandrashekar., aga for r1 & r2; sri. yogesh d. naik, advocate for r3 and r4) this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 fo the constitution of india praying to a) set aside the impugned order dated 07.03.2024 in no. nae 35 bmr 2024 (e) passed by respondent no. 2 annexure -a. in so far as petitioner concerned. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, the court made the following: -4-ordersri. mohan kumar d., the learned counsel for the petitioners, after he and sri naveen chandrashekar, the learned additional government advocate who is called upon to accept notice for the first and second respondents, are heard for sometime, files a memo for withdrawal. the memo is accepted and the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate writ petition. the liberty is reserved subject to all just exceptions in law. sd/- judge

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7745 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:

1. DEVARAJ D M S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/A KUNDANA HOBLI DIODDACHEEMANAHALLI KUNDANA

2. SRINIVAS N

S/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A 36, 19TH CROSS BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR DASARAHALLI Digitally BANGALORE-24. signed by ANAND N Location: 3. MUNIRAJAPPA HIGH COURT OF S/O LATE CHIKKAVENATARAYAPPA KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/A 1, DEVANAHALLI TALUK DYAVARAHALLI VILLAGE JALIGE HOBLI -2-

4. GURURAJ S/O MUNIRAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

5. GANGAPPA S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A JALIGE POST DYAVARAHALLI …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHANKUMARA D.,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-01.

2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, BANGALORE-560001.

3. BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA

PLANNING AUTHORITY(BIAAPA) NO.333/1, IST FLOOR V J COMPLEX SULIBELE ROAD DEVANAHALLI TOWN BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BANGALORE-562110 REPRESENTED BY MEMBER SECRETARY. -3-

4. BANGALORE METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(BMRDA) NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD VASANTH NAGAR BANGALORE-560052 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

5. SRI V SHANTH KUMAR

S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS JALIGE POST DEVANAHALLI TALUK …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR., AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 FO THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07.03.2024 IN NO. NAE 35 BMR 2024 (E) PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO. 2 ANNEXURE -A. IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -4-

ORDER

Sri. Mohan Kumar D., the learned counsel for the petitioners, after he and Sri Naveen Chandrashekar, the learned Additional Government Advocate who is called upon to accept notice for the first and second respondents, are heard for sometime, files a memo for withdrawal. The memo is accepted and the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate writ petition. The liberty is reserved subject to all just exceptions in law. SD/- JUDGE

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Devaraj D M vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge B M Shyam Prasad

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales