Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manaf, vs State of Kerala,

MANAF, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 16, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1888159

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/2299/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MANAF,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice raja vijayaraghavan v tuesday, the 16th day of july 2019 / 25th ashadha, 1941 crl.mc.no.2299 of 2019 against the proceedings in lp no.15/2018 on the file of the district court & sessions court, manjeri crime no.39/2017 of tirur police station, malappuram petitioner/4th accused: manaf, aged 42 years, s/o.abdu rahman, puchakadavathu house, puthiyakadappuram, unnilal, tirur, by advs. sri.p.martin jose sri.p.t.sheejish respondents/state & de facto complainant: 1 state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin- 682 031.2 ishaque, aged 46, s/o.kammu, residing at kammuttakath house, unniyal (p.o.), puthiyakadappuram, tirur, malappuram dist. - 676 502. by adv. sri.ajoy venu by sri. ramesh chand public prosecutor this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 16.07.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.mc:2299 of 2019 2orderwhen the matter was taken up, sri.p.martin jose, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition reserving the right of the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings. reserving such right, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v., judge krj crl.mc:2299 of 2019 3 appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure a1 certified copy of the final report in crime no.39 of 2017, of tanur police station in annexure a2 the affidavit, solemnly affirmed by the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 25TH ASHADHA, 1941 Crl.MC.No.2299 of 2019 AGAINST THE PROCEEDINGS IN LP NO.15/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, MANJERI CRIME NO.39/2017 OF TIRUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED: MANAF, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.ABDU RAHMAN, PUCHAKADAVATHU HOUSE, PUTHIYAKADAPPURAM, UNNILAL, TIRUR, BY ADVS. SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH RESPONDENTS/STATE & DE FACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682 031.

2 ISHAQUE, AGED 46, S/O.KAMMU, RESIDING AT KAMMUTTAKATH HOUSE, UNNIYAL (P.O.), PUTHIYAKADAPPURAM, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DIST. - 676 502. BY ADV. SRI.AJOY VENU BY SRI. RAMESH CHAND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC:2299 OF 2019 2

ORDER

When the matter was taken up, Sri.P.Martin Jose, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition reserving the right of the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings. Reserving such right, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE KRJ Crl.MC:2299 OF 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.39 OF 2017, OF TANUR POLICE STATION IN ANNEXURE A2 THE AFFIDAVIT, SOLEMNLY AFFIRMED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial