Vinoth Vs State Represented by the Inspector of Police,

Vinoth vs State Represented by the Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1887816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1887816
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
Decided On: Aug 28, 2025
Case Number: CRL MP/14633/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinoth

Respondent

State Represented by the Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

.....sentence imposed on the petitioners by the district judge, mayiladuthurai in crl.a.no.17 of 2023 dated 16.10.2024 confirming theorder of judicial magistrate court no.1, mayiladuthurai in cc.no.116 of2022 dated 31.08.2023 pending disposal of the above criminal revision petition.2. the petitioners are the accused in cc.no.116 of 2022 on thefile of the learned judicial magistrate court no.1, mayiladuthurai. they were found guilty of the offences under sections 294(b), 354 & 355 of ipc and they have been convicted and sentenced as under: 1 section 294(b) of each to pay fine of rs.500/-, in default to ipc undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week 2 section 354 of ipc each to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month 3section 355 of ipc each to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred appeal before learned district judge, mayiladuthurai in crl.a.no.17 of 2023, wherein thejudgment of the trial court was confirmed, against which the aforesaidcriminal revision has been filed.3. heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused, all the materials placed before this court.4. on perusal of records, this court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence. further, the trial court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and convicted the petitioners.5. in the result, this petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderlokg.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.lok to 1.the district judge, mayiladuthurai 2.the judicial magistrate court no.1, mayiladuthurai 3.inspector of police, 4.the public prosecutor, high court of madras in

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.08.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in 1.Vinoth 2.Vasanth 3.Balaji ...Petitioners Vs. State represented By the Inspector of Police, CC.No.116 of 2022 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Sections 438(1) of BNSS, praying to suspend the sentence imposed on the appellant by the District Judge, Mayiladuthurai in Crl.A.No.17 of 2023 dated 16.10.2024 confirming the order of Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Mayiladuthurai in CC.No.116 of 2022 dated 31.08.2023 pending disposal of the above criminal revision petition. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate(crl.side0

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed praying to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioners by the District Judge, Mayiladuthurai in Crl.A.No.17 of 2023 dated 16.10.2024 confirming the

order of Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Mayiladuthurai in CC.No.116 of

2022 dated 31.08.2023 pending disposal of the above criminal revision petition.

2. The petitioners are the accused in CC.No.116 of 2022 on the

file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Mayiladuthurai. They were found guilty of the offences under Sections 294(b), 354 & 355 of IPC and they have been convicted and sentenced as under: 1 Section 294(b) of Each to pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default to IPC undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week 2 Section 354 of IPC Each to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month 3Section 355 of IPC Each to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred appeal before learned District Judge, Mayiladuthurai in Crl.A.No.17 of 2023, wherein the

judgment of the trial court was confirmed, against which the aforesaid

criminal revision has been filed.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused, all the materials placed before this Court.

4. On perusal of records, this Court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence. Further, the Trial Court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and convicted the petitioners.

5. In the result, this petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No

Speaking/non-speaking order

lok

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok To 1.The District Judge, Mayiladuthurai 2.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Mayiladuthurai 3.Inspector of Police, 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras in

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Vinoth vs State Represented by the Inspector of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan