Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lilly vs Saji.P.G

LILLY vs Saji.P.G

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 17, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1887205

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/655/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

LILLY

Respondent

Saji.P.G

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice shaji p.chaly tuesday, the 17th day of december 2019 / 26th agrahayana, 1941 against the order/judgment in wp(c) 15915/2018(l) of high court of kerala petitioner/s: lilly aged 52 years w/o augusthy, cherangadan house, kodali desom, mattathur village, chalakudy taluk, thrissur district by adv. sri.n.l.bitto respondent/s: saji.p.g aged 55 years fathers name and address not known, the secretary, mattathur grama panchayath, mattathur p.o.thrissur district 680 684. r1 by adv. sri.m.r.venugopal r1 by adv. smt.dhanya p.ashokan this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 17.12.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthis contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 6.7.2018 is not complied with. today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directives in the judgment are complied with. therefore, i do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further. accordingly, the contempt case is closed. sd/ shaji p.chaly judge jm/ appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure a1 a true copy of the judgment in wpc no 15915 of 2018 dated 6.7.2018 of this hon'ble court

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15915/2018(L) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: LILLY AGED 52 YEARS W/O AUGUSTHY, CHERANGADAN HOUSE, KODALI DESOM, MATTATHUR VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.N.L.BITTO RESPONDENT/S: SAJI.P.G AGED 55 YEARS FATHERS NAME AND ADDRESS NOT KNOWN, THE SECRETARY, MATTATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MATTATHUR P.O.THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 684. R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL R1 BY ADV. SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 6.7.2018 is not complied with. Today when the matter is taken up, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directives in the judgment are complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. Sd/ SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE Jm/ APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO 15915 OF 2018 DATED 6.7.2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial