C Gowri Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police,

C Gowri vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1886740

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1886740
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar
Decided On: Jun 27, 2025
Case Number: /17866/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C Gowri

Respondent

The State represented by The Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

.....20(b)(ii)(b), 29(2)(a) & 8(a)(a) of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 in crime no.369 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.the case of the prosecution is that on receipt of secret information, on 09.10.2024 the respondent police conducted vehicle check near kaveri nagar, at that time, the accused came in a two wheeler bearing reg.no.tn- 28-by-6410 and they were found in possession of 3.100 kgs of ganja. hence, the complaint. 3.the learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. he further submits that based on the confession of co-accused, the petitioner is arrayed as a3. 4.learned government advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as a3 and he has got one previous case of similar in nature. page no.2 of 4 6.considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner has one previous case of similar in nature, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7.accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. vv2 to 1.the inspector of police, 2.the public prosecutor, madras high court. page no.3 of 4m.nirmal kumar, j.vv2 page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR C.Gowri ... Petitioner Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, In Cr.No.369/2024. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.369 of 2024 by the respondent Police pending investigation and grant anticipatory bail. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Mohan For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

Page No.1 of 4 The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 29(2)(a) & 8(A)(a) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Crime No.369 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on receipt of secret information, on 09.10.2024 the respondent Police conducted vehicle check near Kaveri Nagar, at that time, the accused came in a two wheeler bearing Reg.No.TN- 28-BY-6410 and they were found in possession of 3.100 kgs of ganja. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He further submits that based on the confession of co-accused, the petitioner is arrayed as A3. 4.Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as A3 and he has got one previous case of similar in nature. Page No.2 of 4 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner has one previous case of similar in nature, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. vv2 To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. Page No.3 of 4

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

vv2 Page No.4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties C Gowri vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar