Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kannan vs the State, Represented by Its Inspector,

Kannan vs The State, Represented by Its Inspector,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 30, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1886576

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/7700/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kannan

Respondent

The State, Represented by Its Inspector,

Excerpt

inin the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.04.2025coramthe honourable mr justice sunder mohan in kannan petitioner(s) vs the state rep by cr.no.45 of 2025. respondent(s) for petitioner(s): mr.d.ashokkumar for respondent(s): mr.s.balaji government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed to relax the condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further page no.1 of 3 in orders.” imposed by this court in crl.o.p.no.6217 of 2025 dated 11.03.2025. 2.the learned government advocate (criminal side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly imposed by this court.3. considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of the offence, the condition in paragraph no. 7(b) imposed on the petitioner in crl.o.p.no.6217 of 2025 dated 11.03.2025 is relaxed.4. accordingly, the criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. ep to page no.2 of 3 insunder mohan, j.ep in page no.3 of 3

Full Judgment

in

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Kannan Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By Cr.No.45 of 2025. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Ashokkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to relax the condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further Page No.1 of 3 in orders.” imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.6217 of 2025 dated 11.03.2025. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.

3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of the offence, the condition in paragraph no. 7(b) imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.6217 of 2025 dated 11.03.2025 is relaxed.

4. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. ep To Page No.2 of 3 in

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

ep in Page No.3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial