Selvaraj vs the Chief Engineer

Selvaraj vs The Chief Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 02, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1884228

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1884228
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Decided On: Sep 02, 2025
Case Number: WP/32631/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Selvaraj

Respondent

The Chief Engineer

Excerpt

.....ahamed12. mohanam bal13. naresh kumar14. dharsini ... respondentswrit petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments as in the form of auto stand, association flag poles, hoardings made by respondents 6 to 14 in the highways road comprising in t.s.no.1 situated at ward b (43.periya kottai, 44 kanakampalayam), udumalpet town and taluk, tiruppur district by considering the petitioner representation dated 06.02.2025.page nos.2/6 for petitioner : mr.k.myilsamyorder[order of the court was made by m.sundar, j.,] after some arguments, mr.k.myilsamy, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner sought leave of this court to withdraw the captioned 'writ petition' ['wp' for the sake of brevity] as state has since initiated 'removal of encroachment' ['roe'] proceedings.2. the endorsement made by learned counsel in the case file is as follows: page nos.3/63. while we permit the writ petitioner to withdraw captioned wp, we make it clear that roe proceedings of state will include removal of encroachments, if any by writ petitioner too. captioned wp is disposed of as closed/withdrawn. there shall be noorder as to costs.(m.s.,j.) (m.s.k.,j.) 02.09.2025 index : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no gpa page nos.4/6 to1. the chief engineer chennai2. the divisional engineer no.21, alangiam road, dharapuram3. the assistant divisional engineer madathukulam4. the commissioner udumalpet municipality udumalpet5. the tahsildar udumapet page nos.5/6 m.sundar, j., and mummineni sudheer kumar, j., gpa 02.09.2025 page nos.6/6

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Chief Engineer Chennai
2. The Divisional Engineer No.21, Alangiam Road, Dharapuram
3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer Madathukulam
4. The Commissioner Udumalpet Municipality Udumalpet Page Nos.1/6
5. The Tahsildar Udumapet
6. Srinivasan
7. Suresh
8. Manikandan
9. Balamurugan
10. Pandiyaraj
11. Sabeer Ahamed
12. Mohanam Bal
13. Naresh Kumar
14. Dharsini ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments as in the form of auto stand, association flag poles, hoardings made by Respondents 6 to 14 in the Highways Road comprising in T.S.No.1 situated at Ward B (43.Periya Kottai, 44 Kanakampalayam), Udumalpet Town and Taluk, Tiruppur District by considering the petitioner representation dated 06.02.2025.
Page Nos.2/6 For Petitioner : Mr.K.Myilsamy

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] After some arguments, Mr.K.Myilsamy, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity] as State has since initiated 'Removal of Encroachment' ['RoE'] proceedings.

2. The endorsement made by learned counsel in the case file is as follows: Page Nos.3/6

3. While we permit the writ petitioner to withdraw captioned WP, we make it clear that RoE proceedings of State will include removal of encroachments, if any by writ petitioner too. Captioned WP is disposed of as closed/withdrawn. There shall be no

order as to costs.

(M.S.,J.) (M.S.K.,J.) 02.09.2025 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No gpa Page Nos.4/6 To

1. The Chief Engineer Chennai

2. The Divisional Engineer No.21, Alangiam Road, Dharapuram

3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer Madathukulam

4. The Commissioner Udumalpet Municipality Udumalpet

5. The Tahsildar Udumapet Page Nos.5/6 M.SUNDAR, J., and MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J., gpa 02.09.2025 Page Nos.6/6

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Selvaraj vs The Chief Engineer Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice Mummine...