Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Rahamathullah vs the District Collector

Rahamathullah vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 30, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1883454

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/15936/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rahamathullah

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....old patta no.1248 and pass orders.for petitioner(s): mr.j.mohamed ibrahim for respondent: mr.m.r.gokul krishnan additional government pleader for r1 to r4orderthis writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to act upon the representation made by the petitioner on 30.12.2024 wherein the petitioner is seeking for cancellation of patta that stands in the name of respondents 5 and 6 and to issue patta in the name of the petitioner with respect to the subject property.2. heard mr.j.mohamed ibrahim, learned counsel for the petitioner and mr.m.r.gokul krishnan, learned additional government pleader for respondents 1 to 4.3. taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the caseand considering the materials placed before this court, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to act upon the representation made by the petitioner on 30.12.2024 on its own merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity to respondents 5 and 6 and pass orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.4. this writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. no costs. 30-04-2025 rka index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the district collector the collectorate office, perambaur 2.the district revenue officer, the collectorate office, perambalur 3.the revenue divisional officer, the revenue divisional office, 4.the thasildar, thasildar office, n.anand venkatesh j. rka 30-04-2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-04-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

1. RAHAMATHULLAH S/o.Muthalib, 3/83, Big Nachi Road, Uthangudi, Madurai District. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Collector

The Collectorate Office, Perambaur 2.The District Revenue Officer, The Collectorate Office, Perambalur 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, 4.The Thasildar, Thasildar Office, 5.Raju, S/o.Govindasamy, 18, Kaveri Street, Madura Kavulpalayam, Perambalur

6.Prabakaran, S/o. Raju, 18, Kaveri Street, Madura Kavulpalayam Perambalur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Wrti petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents No. 3 to conduct an enquuiry based on the Petitioner's representation dated 30.12.2024 within time frame as fixed by this Honble Court and consequently, cancel the Patta No. 5765 and restore the old patta No.1248 and pass orders.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Mohamed Ibrahim For Respondent: Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to act upon the representation made by the petitioner on 30.12.2024 wherein the petitioner is seeking for cancellation of patta that stands in the name of respondents 5 and 6 and to issue patta in the name of the petitioner with respect to the subject property.

2. Heard Mr.J.Mohamed Ibrahim, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader for Respondents 1 to 4.

3. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case

and considering the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to act upon the representation made by the petitioner on 30.12.2024 on its own merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity to respondents 5 and 6 and pass orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 30-04-2025 rka Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The District Collector The Collectorate Office, Perambaur 2.The District Revenue Officer, The Collectorate Office, Perambalur 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, 4.The Thasildar, Thasildar Office, N.ANAND VENKATESH J. rka 30-04-2025

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Rahamathullah vs The District Collector Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales