Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Biju vs State of Kerala

BIJU vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 04, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1883338

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/6167/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

BIJU

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

crl.mc.no.6167 of 2015 against the order/judgment in cmp 69/2014 of judicial first class petitioner/3rd accused: biju aged 39 years s/o.ouseph, thekkinedath house, mangalassery, koratty south p.o., thrissur-680308. respondents: represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. 2 tency v.j. aged 32 years d/o.jose, vayaliparambil hosue, kanjoor kizhakkumbhagam village, kanjoor p.o., ernakulam.sri.saigi jacob palatty, public prosecutor 04.12.2019, along with crl.mc.1182/2016, the court on the same day passed the following: & crl.mc.no.1182 of 2016 against the order/judgment in cc 90/2016 of judicial first class petitioners/1st & 2nd accused:1 baiju aged 43 years s/o.ouseph, thekkinedath house, mangalassery, koratty south po, thrissur 680308 2 ammini aged 72 years w/o.ouseph, thekkinedath house, mangalassery, koratty south p.o, thrissur- 680308 respondents/de facto complainant & state: represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682031 2 tency vj aged 38 years d/o.jose, vayaliparambil house, kanjoor kizhakkumbhagam village, kanjoor po, ernakulam-683 575 04.12.2019, along with crl.mc.6167/2015, the court on the same day passed the following: &alexander thomas, j.& dated this the 04th day of december, 2019ordersri.jinish paul, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in these two cases would submit on the basis of instructions his parties that the above petitions may be closed as infructuous, as the matter has been settled out of court between the parties concerned. recording the abovesaid submission of the petitioners, the above crl.m.cs will stand dismissed as not pressed. sd/- alexander thomas judge vgd

Full Judgment

Crl.MC.No.6167 OF 2015 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 69/2014 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED: BIJU AGED 39 YEARS S/O.OUSEPH, THEKKINEDATH HOUSE, MANGALASSERY, KORATTY SOUTH P.O., THRISSUR-680308. RESPONDENTS: REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 TENCY V.J. AGED 32 YEARS D/O.JOSE, VAYALIPARAMBIL HOSUE, KANJOOR KIZHAKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE, KANJOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM.

SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 04.12.2019, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.1182/2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: & Crl.MC.No.1182 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 90/2016 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS PETITIONERS/1ST & 2ND ACCUSED:

1 BAIJU AGED 43 YEARS S/O.OUSEPH, THEKKINEDATH HOUSE, MANGALASSERY, KORATTY SOUTH PO, THRISSUR 680308 2 AMMINI AGED 72 YEARS W/O.OUSEPH, THEKKINEDATH HOUSE, MANGALASSERY, KORATTY SOUTH P.O, THRISSUR- 680308 RESPONDENTS/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT & STATE: REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031 2 TENCY VJ AGED 38 YEARS D/O.JOSE, VAYALIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANJOOR KIZHAKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE, KANJOOR PO, ERNAKULAM-683 575 04.12.2019, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.6167/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: &

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

& Dated this the 04th day of December, 2019

ORDER

Sri.Jinish Paul, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in these two cases would submit on the basis of instructions his parties that the above petitions may be closed as infructuous, as the matter has been settled out of court between the parties concerned. Recording the abovesaid submission of the petitioners, the above Crl.M.Cs will stand dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE vgd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial