Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P Bhaskar vs Arvind Gregory

P Bhaskar vs Arvind Gregory

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 19, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1882902

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/838/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P Bhaskar

Respondent

Arvind Gregory

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 19th day of december, 2024 before the hon'ble mrs justice m g uma criminal appeal no. 838 of 2019 (a) between: p. bhaskar, s/o. panchakshari, aged about 56 years, r/at no 212-213, 29th main, 12th cross, b.t.m. ii stage bangalore - 560 076 …appellant (by sri. praveen .c.p., advocate (ab)) digitally signed by nandini b g and: location: high court of arvind gregory, karnataka s/o antony joseph, aged about 42 years, r/at no 102, sesha illam, 4th main, 5th cross, vijaya bank layout, bannerghatta road, bengaluru - 560 076 …respondent this crl.a is filed u/s.378(4) cr.p.c praying to set aside the impugned judgment dated 26.02.2019 passed by the xiii a.c.m.m., bangalore in c.c.no.32437/2014 - acquitting the respondents/accused for the offence p/u/s 138 of the n.i act. this crl.a, coming on for hearing - interlocutory appln, this day, judgment was delivered therein as under: coram: hon'ble mrs justice m g uma -2-oral judgmentlearned counsel for the appellant is absent. no representation, even when the matter is passed over twice and again called at 3.30 pm. the appeal is of the year 2019. steps are not taken for issuance of notice to the respondent. the order sheet dated 29.11.2024 reads as under: "learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to furnish the correct address of the respondent. finally, re-list this matter after two weeks." inspite of that there is no progress in the matter. hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- (m g uma) judge bh list no.: 1 sl no.: 14

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 838 OF 2019 (A) BETWEEN: P. BHASKAR, S/O. PANCHAKSHARI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO 212-213, 29TH MAIN, 12TH CROSS, B.T.M. II STAGE BANGALORE - 560 076 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRAVEEN .C.P., ADVOCATE (AB)) Digitally signed by NANDINI B G AND: Location: high court of ARVIND GREGORY, karnataka S/O ANTONY JOSEPH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO 102, SESHA ILLAM, 4TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS, VIJAYA BANK LAYOUT, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 26.02.2019 PASSED BY THE XIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.32437/2014 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF THE N.I ACT. THIS CRL.A, COMING ON FOR HEARING - INTERLOCUTORY APPLN, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA -2-

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation, even when the matter is passed over twice and again called at 3.30 pm. The appeal is of the year 2019. Steps are not taken for issuance of notice to the respondent. The order sheet dated 29.11.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to furnish the correct address of the respondent. Finally, re-list this matter after two weeks." Inspite of that there is no progress in the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial